ROK Army Sexual Assault Update
|UPDATE: Thanks to the comments section it has been clarified that this ROK Army soldier will do no jail time. He will be on probation for four years and as long as he doesn’t sexually assault anyone during that time he will do no jail time. Incredible, especially when you consider all the righteous outrage when ever a USFK soldier sexually assaults a Korean national. I don’t know of one USFK soldier getting a suspended sentence for sexually assaulting a Korean.Â
What is even more telling is when you compare this case to the case where a US soldier was sentenced by a US military court to 30 years in prison for sexually assaulting a Korean KATUSA soldier at Camp Jackson while this Korean ROK Army soldier receives no jail time for sexually assaulting an American female. I’m not saying the ROK Army soldier should get 30 years in jail because every case is different, but no jail time at all? Come on, if this sentence was given to an American GI for sexually assaulting a Korean I can only image in the righteous outrage over it, but since it was an American that was sexually assaulted, nobody cares.Â
_______________________________________
The ROK Army soldier who sexually assaulted a US female soldier has been sentenced by a ROK Army court:
A South Korean 6th Infantry Division soldier was sentenced Wednesday to 2 ½ years in prison for sexually assaulting a female U.S. soldier during a joint training exercise.
However, the sentence was suspended for four years, according to a South Korean 6th ID spokesman.
The South Korean military refused to allow Stars and Stripes to cover the court-martial.
The male soldier, whose name was not released, was arrested on the last day of the U.S. Army 2nd Infantry Division’s Warfighter exercise.
It is great the guy was punished but what is the four year suspension for? It just doesn’t seem right that this guy is allowed to walk around for four years before doing his jail time.
Additionally, I found it interesting how the Korean media has not touched this story. None of the English language Korean media sites had anything on this story plus I checked over at the Korean language Naver and Yonhap and didn’t see anything there either. If someone else sees something in the Korean media on this story let me know. Providing little to no coverage of the rapes and sexual assaults of USFK soldiers and foreigners in Korea is nothing new. What will be most interesting is to compare the news coverage this story is getting to the news coverage of when the 2nd Infantry Division soldier is sentenced for last months alleged sexual assault of an elderly Korean woman.
You can do an experiment yourself and ask a Korean if USFK soldiers have been raped by a Korean before. They more than likely will tell you no. Then ask them if USFK soldiers have raped Koreans and they will obviously tell you yes. This is all because of the slanted news coverage. If you really want to have fun with them ask them when the last time a murder involving a Korean and a USFK service member happened. They will probably tell you one of the infamous juicy girl murders when in fact the last murder between an USFK service member and a Korean was when a Korean man murdered an American major in Itaewon. I haven’t met a Korean yet who heard of that crime when I asked them, just like very few will ever hear of the crime the ROK Army soldier committed as well.Â
I thought a suspended sentence means no jail time at all as long as he doesn't get caught doing something else illegal within that time frame???
I had an adult student in his mid-20s who told me about 15 Korean women are raped and killed a year by GIs, but it is covered up.
I went to ask a Korean female teacher I worked with (35 years old or so) about it, because I would frequently talk to her about things that were confusing, becasue she had a level head, and she said, "That sounds about right."
Every once in a while when GI crimes came up in a class, which it did a couple of times a month as new students rotated in, if the class had a lot of people I'd been teaching and was comfortable with, I'd ask them, and the general idea was that 15 might be high, but it wasn't far from the mark.
USinKorea is right about the suspension. No time will be served, period.
So basically the guy is on probation for 4 years and if he doesn't sexually assault anyone else during this time he will see no jail time? If so that is jacked up but I doubt anyone in USFK will raise stink about it.
Yup … that be the way it is.
Hmmm…
I remember the big knee-jerk reactions that happened after a Korean "murdered an American major". Ahhh… another fond memory of head-in-ass USFK leadership.
That is when the Wingman policy at Osan started… couldn't go downtown without a date. That changed to be a nighttime-thing-only a few days later when everyone realized that a lot of officers lived off-base and needed someone to escort them to the main gate… and their escort needed an escort when leaving the main gate… ahhh, levels of complexity too great for uninspired leadership.
(please correct anything from the following story you don't feel is right).
Then details leaked out that the major actually had TWO people with him when he was stabbed… hence the Wingman policy was a sham (just like the .10 BAC and No Girls In Rooms policies).
Oh, yes, and his two buddies were doctors… as was he. Three doctors can't save a stab victim but your mandatory drunk Load Toad wingman is there to help you. Uh-huh.
Then it came out that our fearless major tried to show off to his friends how much shitty-asshole-GI Korean he could speak after a week or so in-country… so, he spoke the most rude and offensive bar-whore Korean he had learned to a helpless down-and-out homeless person rummaging through trash on the street.
Except the homeless person wasn't so helpless. He had the deadly combination of Korean Pride and a kitchen knife. The major got the Gift of Cold Steel in the liver to assist him in minding his own fucking business. Happy Birthday, loudmouth round-eye motherfucker.
Osan's Wingman Policy, of course, didn't address the facts that there were TWO wingmen, they were medically trained and it was something like 3 in the afternoon.
Nobody in USFK suggested a Keep Your Fucking Mouth Shut training class… of course. That would too easily solve most of the problems between GIs and Koreans… much more than Buddies, Wingmen, curfews or BAC limits.
Once again, this is the story I remember from a pretty good source about 6 years ago… with the only addition being my smart-assed slant. I am curious if it represents what really happened.
—
After writing this, I decided I'd better do some looking on my own to see if any facts fit my memory… turns out, they do.
Major Dave Berry was walking with TWO other doctors. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2000/n07212000…
A little more info here that gives the setup: https://www.ausa.org/webpub/DeptArmyMagazine.nsf/…
Of course USFK says the attack was unprovoked… something I have never seen in Korea… and a suspect statement considering the homeless man was in Iteawon and had a number of random targets throughout the day.
Somebody who was involved in the investigation told me the whole story including Marjor Berry showing off his Korean language skills. As my memory was accurate for the rest of the story, I imagine this aspect is accurate, too.
Don't bitch at me as I am just repeating what I heard from a good source.
Anybody wish to confirm or deny this?
As for this Korean on American GI sexual assault, I would hope USFK would back her in a civil action against him. This may or may not gain some needed publicity but it will, most probably, result in a settlement that will allow her to pay off some credit card debt.
usinkorea,
Try this: Give homework to your students to collect information about the numerous rapes and killings done by American GIs in 2006. Tease them mercilessly when they fail to produce results. O.K. Don't. Be nice and innocently ask for explanations. Report your results here. I'm curious about what rationalizations they may give.
J!
[…] GI Korea has an update on the case of a female American soldier who was sexually assaulted by a Korean soldier during an exercise. The soldier was found guilty. And how much time did he get? Zip. The 2 1/2 year sentence is an insult by itself, but the court suspended the entire sentence. […]
Chickenhead wrote:
"Then it came out that our fearless major tried to show off to his friends how much shitty-asshole-GI Korean he could speak after a week or so in-country… so, he spoke the most rude and offensive bar-whore Korean he had learned to a helpless down-and-out homeless person rummaging through trash on the street."
PROVE IT. It is disgusting that you would slander a dead person who cannot speak for himself. The Korean papers at the time printed the murderer's allegation that the doctor had insulted him, but those same papers described the man as mentally unstable. Koreans who attack or kill foreigners are almost always described that way.
You claim to have inside information but won't give any specifics. Why the heck should anyone believe an anonymous poster?
"Of course USFK says the attack was unprovoked… something I have never seen in Korea…"
Well, unprovoked hostility is something I and other foreigners have experienced. I was threatened on several occasions and cornered twice. A 6'4" Moroccan husband of a colleague was periodically harassed and assaulted on the street by Korean tough guys who wanted to prove to their friends that they could beat up the foreign giant. He just ignored these fools because he knew he'd wind up in jail if he tried to defend himself.
Chickenhead, you're probably one of those Koreans who believes internet rumors about how the two GIs deliberately ran over the two girls and laughed about it later. The internet rumor mongers, like you, claimed to have inside info, citing KATUSA acquaintances as their source.
BTW, the doctor had been in Korea a whopping TEN DAYS. That is hardly enough time to learn numbers and basic expressions, nevermind cuss words and "bar Korean." Given that he had been in Korea for such a short time, I cannot believe that he would have been capable of hurling insults in Korean. Use your common sense, Chickenhead.
What got me was how after the man stabbed the doctor people in the crowd did not help which really isn't surprising, but someone in the crowd tried to grab the knife but one of the soldiers involved grabbed the knife before it could be grabbed by someone in the crowd. Some other American walking by helped restrain the murderer while the doctors tried to help their stabbed friend.
The only way the doctor was evacuated from Itaewon was by an American driving by stopping and helping take the Major to Yongsan but it was to late by the time they got there. I have always wondered if people in the crowd had helped immediately after the incident restrain the murderer maybe the doctors could have provided first aid and found a ride to Yongsan quicker to save his life.
Chickenhead wrote:
about the female GI raped by a Korean:
"As for this Korean on American GI sexual assault, I would hope USFK would back her in a civil action against him. This may or may not gain some needed publicity but it will, most probably, result in a settlement that will allow her to pay off some credit card debt."
about the murder of an American doctor by a Korean:
"so, he spoke the most rude and offensive bar-whore Korean he had learned to a helpless down-and-out homeless person rummaging through trash on the street."
You showed more compassion for a Korean murderer than for an American rape victim or the murdered doctor who left behind a pregnant wife and four kids. It's obvious how nationality influences your sympathies. GI Korea, under which rock did this troll crawl out of?
Sonagi,
Deep breath. Relax.
I repeated what I heard from a member of the American military who was involved in the investigation. Obviously, I cannot "prove it" as it was a conversation that happened years ago. After a quick Internet search, I found my memory to be correct in all other aspects of the conversation.
I stand by my memory of the conversation. Once again, I offer anyone with direct knowledge of the incident to "to confirm or deny" this version of the story and to "please correct anything from the following story you don’t feel is right".
Your emotional denial may be based on fewer facts than my statements which, true or not, were made to me by someone involved in the original incident indicating to me that, despite public statements, USFK believed the major said something which was perceived as provoking by the homeless man.
In answer to your post, I will add that many people learn a bad word or two in Korean at, or before, arrival. I have seen the "I have been here 10 days and look what I can say" mentality many, many times. So has everyone else here.
I will further add that a Korean homeless person, digging through trash, suddenly standing up and committing a random and unprovoked stabbing on a group of 3 men walking by in the middle of the day does not ring true to me.
Just knowing people, if I had to bet money on an "unprovoked attack" or the major saying, "ship-sae-ki," I know where my chips are going.
I would further like to point out that a main intention of the post was to show how far Osan leadership was from reality at that time (and now) as their Wingman Policy consists of groups of two at night. The undisputed facts of the incident which provoked the Wingman Policy concerned a group of three doctors in the middle of the day. Am I the only one who sees the irony here?
I would also like to point out that I have seen GIs run their mouths to Koreans in a provoking manner (as they do to each other) yet Osan (and maybe USFK) has not invented a program to combat this behavior.
Next issue. The female American GI was not raped; she was "touched" against her will in a semi-public setting. Big difference. (Technically, I see this happening to Filipinas every time I go to a juicy bar.)
http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&a…
It seems YOU are the one spreading Internet rumor. Shame.
But don't think I have no compassion for her. Being awoken to this kind of thing would be irritating, bordering on traumatic. USFK has a duty to insure servicemembers can sleep without fear of their titties being felt up. The real story here is, "How did a Korean male slip into an American all-female barracks at 3am with a flashlight?" I'm guessing that security is tighter at an Ewha Womens' University dorm.
On a final note, I am always interested when someone makes a claim such as they were "threatened on several occasions and cornered twice". I have lived in Korea for many years, traveled all over the country, drank heavily in the "roughest" neighborhoods, etc… and I have NEVER even felt uncomfortable.
Twice, I have been randomly insulted (by smack-talking punks, not unlike smack-talking GIs). Both times, I gave an innocent look, bowed slightly and said in Korean, "Why did you speak badly to me? You don't even know me." Both times, the loudmouth put his head down while his buddies laughed at him and apologized to me.
Based on my experience, and the experience of other foreigners I admire and respect, I just cannot understand those who get in "situations" with Koreans.
J!
On the highly charged comment about the GI doctor asking to get stabbed and killed, there must of been a lot of "please kick my ass" stuff going on at that time, because the doctor's case was one of several that had made the Stars and Stripes in the heady days of 2000 — when Unification Fever was sky high thanks to the NK-SK Sumit – and Korean society as a whole was whipping itself into a frenzy over any and everything it could find with USFK – including about 40 gallons of fromalyne (sp?) dumped in the Yongsan sewer. 2000 did not reach the ferocity of 2002, but it wasn't that far from it, and it had wave after wave of anti-US activity by the whole society – pumped up endlessly by the press – for month after month.
And like in 2002, there were a series of reports of GIs and the spouses of GIs (Westerners) in Itaewan and elsewhere.
Next, as Sonagi said, I too can speak of some unprovoked encounters in my 4 years in Korea – usually about 1 or 2 a year.
I don't count 2002 when I was back and taking public transportation a lot – because in that abnormal time, I had about 4 or 5 close calls within a 6 month period.
2 were with mentally ill people on the subway.
1 was with a nearly falling down drunk on the train.
I have also had "conversations" when out and about with Korean males who I could quickly tell were trying to get me onto a conversation topic where they could feel "justified" in unloading their pent up Korean angst.
9 out of 10 Koreans who would come up to me in public (especially on public transporation) were beyond nice — usually nice to the point of being rude
but I did meet the 1 out of 10 enough to begin to recognize them when they first approached.
In the 1990s, walking the street with a Korean female could get you some unwanted street confrontations. Don't know about now…
And being black or hispanic was different from being white – big time…
On the asking the students to give me examples ——
that was how I first started to realize something was wrong with their anti-US thoughts.
I came to Korea after having met a group of Korean in France who I found out only told me the good side.
When I got to Korea, I was only teaching adults, and the typical anti-US topics, espeically anti-USFK, were the ones they most frequently wanted to talk about.
I knew nothing — so when they told me GIs rape and kill (both together) 15 Korean women a year, I didn't know any better. I didn't believe it right away, but I also didn't disbelieve it.
So, when getting bombarded with these topics class after class month to month, I started asking for some examples to help me understand it, and which I could try to find information on via the internet and books.
…….The answer I got almost always was, "We can't give examples, because the Korean and USFK cover them up, but I read it somewhere…."
Since I was seeing news stories about GIs getting arrested for stealing a notebook computer or a pocketbook, and since I got to see how a murder was covered my first year in Korea, I found the cover up idea highly suspect.
And basically, how do you know something is true if it is covered up so well????
Over the years, my disappointment in the common thoughts in my adult classes only grew and grew…..
On what GI Korea was saying about not getting involved, that is one of the things that irritates me greatly about the common GI street fight story where there is usually a Korean mob involved.
I used to live above an older bar area in Wonju, and I saw confrontations all the time. I also saw women confrontations at E-Mart almost every Saturday and Sunday.
Nobody jumped in in almost 100% of the cases.
The worst was when I was leaving to go to teach class, and I saw a university-aged male just kicking the shit out of a middle school or early high school student.
Normally in Korea, I never saw confrontations move to using fists or the like (except the women), but this older kid was bashing the younger guys face in, and the younger guy was just standing there not even raising his hands to defend himself.
I was far away up the street approaching, but nobody would do anything. Before I got there, some guy in a passing delivery truck finally stopped in the middle of the street and got out yelling and walking toward the fight, and then one of the older boy's friends grabbed him and drug him off.
The truck guy got back in the truck and pulled off, and then the people just stood watching as this young boy poured blood out his nose and mouth.
I quickly walked across the street and found a roll of toilet paper and paid for it at the counter, and during all this time, when I got back across the street, people were still just staring at this boy as his face poured blood.
I know there are areas in the US where "don't involved" is still strong.
I know in America nothing getting involved is not such a bad idea, because you never know when one of the people involved is going to have a gun and blow your head off, but come on……
As you can see from the typos and grammar, I just got up…
@ChickenHead:
No emotional denial, but sensible mistrust of someone who:
1) shows hostility towards American crime victims. Even if one gives any credence to the story about the doctor 'getting what he deserved,' the female sexual assault victim was blameless, yet you felt the need to make snide digs about credit card debt and titties getting felt up:
"USFK has a duty to insure servicemembers can sleep without fear of their titties being felt up. The real story here is, “How did a Korean male slip into an American all-female barracks at 3am with a flashlight?†I’m guessing that security is tighter at an Ewha Womens’ University dorm."
Owing to fire regulations, US military barracks are probably not padlocked like Korean university dorms, and that's no exaggeration. While I was in Korea, dormitory doors were chained shut at night.
2) claims to have inside info but does not provide any substantiation; you doubt my experiences yet expect me to believe your hearsay.
3) cannot distinguish a married middle-aged doctor from an 18-yr-old kid, who would be more likely to act with foolish bravado.
"
Based on my experience, and the experience of other foreigners I admire and respect, I just cannot understand those who get in “situations†with Koreans."
To help you understand, let me share one of my negative experiences:
I am sitting on a train reading a magazine. A drunk man in his fifties approaches me and starts screaming at me in Korean. At the time, I had been in Korea only a few months. The only word I could understand was "migook." Two men on the opposite bench, who do not know the screamer, raise their fists and shout encouragement. The screamer's face is inches from mine, and I am afraid of getting hit. I do not know enough Korean yet to utter those magic words that repel any Korean drunk or toughie: "Why did you speak badly to me? You don't even know me.". I elude the man by stepping up to the door at the next station. The man stands next to me, screaming at me the entire time. Everyone else on the subway is looking at the floor. The doors open, the man steps off, I stay on. The doors close.
It's interesting that you blame foreigners for "getting into situations with Koreans." Having lived in three countries and spent a great deal of time in a fourth, I can tell you that there are jerks everywhere. Koreans are not special people with immunity from xenophobia. In fact, I had more negative anti-foreign experiences in Korea than in China, but I would not generalize about Koreans based on my experiences. Often, it's just the luck of the draw and meeting the wrong person on the wrong day.
Likewise, I know many Koreans who've lived in North America. Some have had no problems while others have been insulted by strangers. I don't presume that a Korean who's been called a chink somehow asked for it.
Ah… why do I respond. Boredom maybe?
Sonagi,
"1) shows hostility towards American crime victims. Even if one gives any credence to the story about the doctor ‘getting what he deserved,’ the female sexual assault victim was blameless, yet you felt the need to make snide digs about credit card debt and titties getting felt up:"
a. No hostility… you mistake satire, sarcasm and irony for hostility. The fault is not mine.
b. I didn't say the doctor got what he deserved. I said I heard the attack was provoked. I don't think there is anything he could have said that deserved a knife in the liver… see "a".
c. Statistically speaking, I feel very safe to say she has credit card debt… see "a".
d. I didn't say she got her titties felt up. I said she was "touched" as per the S&S article. I said that, "USFK has a duty to insure servicemembers can sleep without fear of their titties being felt up." That would be all "servicemembers" as opposed to specifically her… see "a".
First you spread the rumor she was raped. Now you misrepresent what I said. Shame. Again.
I bet I could really push your buttons if I made the argument that since he only "touched" her yet she "slapped" him while off-duty, she should be turned over to the Korean legal system, as per SOFA, for prosecution under the charge of assault. Naw, that would be trolling.
I can add here that the barracks did not have to be padlocked. USFK simply needed to post someone to watch over each area to insure dirty little Koreans with flashlights weren't slipping into girls' sleeping areas… still not a bad idea now to stop the sexual assaults that seem to be sweeping USFK.
"2) claims to have inside info but does not provide any substantiation; you doubt my experiences yet expect me to believe your hearsay."
a. I make no claim to inside info. I drank with someone involved in the investigation who casually told me this story. I asked any readers to post information that confirms or denies what I was told. I don't know it to be true. I suspect it is… but that is only my opinion based on my conversation with this person as well as how I feel the world works. I made SEVERAL requests for the story to be corrected if it is wrong.
Substantiation is a difficult thing with a personal conversation. You can't really declare it to be patently false just because it is unsubstantiated. Do you expect a recording? Minutes to be kept? No. Nobody does.
You can believe it happened or you can believe I made it up to fulfill some odd goal or promote some obscure agenda. If you believe I made it up, tell everybody why. You can also believe the conversation happened but the other party didn't tell the truth and you can question my judgment for believing them. Fine. Why? You can also read my writing and determine if I might have the skills necessary to make a good judgment about this person's speaking. Great. No argument.
You choose. Which one and why. Everything else is unsubstantiated yapping on your part.
b. I don't doubt your experiences. I believe you had these experiences. I have not had these experiences. The people who have frequently had these experiences generally fit into the category of "shitbag" either in appearance, attitude, body language, speaking, action or reaction. For the most part, they were "asking for it" even of they did not perceive themselves to be. The two times I was spoken badly to, I was in a bar district and I was with a pretty Korean girl and they were not. Right or wrong, I was asking for it. I knew it and I was prepared to deal with it before I went there.
This does not mean YOU are a shitbag. You could have had bad luck.
c. I don't expect you to believe my hearsay. It is just that, hearsay. I do expect you to give any first or second-hand information you might have that will clarify the situation. Since you were not there, you have not spoken to anyone who was there and you have not spoken to anyone who was involved in the investigation, your denial of my story is less than hearsay.
"3) cannot distinguish a married middle-aged doctor from an 18-yr-old kid, who would be more likely to act with foolish bravado."
a. Having worked in a hospital for 12 years, having 3 close friends who are doctors (one Air Force, one former Air Force, one Korean) and knowing a number of married middle-aged men, I can assure you that thoughtless yapping is not a monopoly of 18 year-olds. He who hasn't yapped some smartassed comment to show off to his friends may cast the first stone.
As for your train experience, I can see that happening. If it were to happen to me in an Asian country, I would simply say, "Sorry" over and over again with an innocent look and bow repeatedly. Everybody understands "sorry" and the body language would defuse the situation. The screamer would have felt that he "showed you", bystanders would respect you for your gentle actions to the drunk/crazy man and you would have the satisfaction of knowing you controlled the situation correctly. Winning is not always about dominating.
If it came to violence for self-protection, your response would be unexpected based on humble body language. Contrast this with what I usually see from Westerners in Korean conflict… puffed chests and lots of "fuck you"s.
That's child's play, Sonagi. What happens when you are actually wrong and you still need to defuse the situation? How about getting caught in Burma with no visa? Cambodian police curious about the sound of fishing with an RPG and a case of Ankor beer? In a small Philippine village when the NPA shows up? Security at Hong Kong airport finds the Airsoft pistols in your carry-on (and still let you take them on the plane!)? Stumble across armed Papuans who weren't expecting whitey? Caught taking pictures of opium poppies in Thailand? And that's just East Asia.
Grow up. Korea is an entry-level country for avoiding hassle where the majority of people are polite, respectful, kind and have enough money/education to want nothing much from you except for you to mind your own business.
I'm still having a hard time finding pity for those who get into frequent conflict with the locals.
Sonagi, don't have any hard feelings and don't take everything so personally. Maybe the dude stabbed the doctor because his thoughts arrive like butterflies but he don't know so he chases them away. Maybe the doctor said something to his friends, they giggled and the guy thought they were talking about him. Maybe the doctor wanted to see what reaction he could get with a freshly-learned Korean swear word from a consequence-free member of society. Maybe somebody here knows… maybe not.
Don't let it ruin your day.
J!
Chickenhead,
As a woman who was groped in Korea and had my breast PUNCHED by a stranger in Indonesia, I take offense to talk about "titties being felt up." Even you mean it in a general way, it is still a very insensitive way to refer to a sexual assault.
"Grow up. Korea is an entry-level country for avoiding hassle where the majority of people are polite, respectful, kind and have enough money/education to want nothing much from you except for you to mind your own business.
I’m still having a hard time finding pity for those who get into frequent conflict with the locals."
I don't need to "grow up." I'm not the one making calloused, insensitive quips about fondling titties. YOU need to grow up and take your vulgar bar talk elsewhere. No wonder you're so quick to judge the dead doctor, given your own crude language.
Otherwise, I agree with what you have written. I lived in Korea almost a decade, so several unpleasant incidents over the course of ten years – an average of less than one per year – does not constitute "frequent conflict."
The ramblings about Cambodia, Burma, etc. are completely irrelevant to this discussion thread about sexual assaults against US soldiers.
"He who hasn’t yapped some smartassed comment to show off to his friends may cast the first stone."
Then let me cast the first stone.
Chickenhead wrote:
"You can’t really declare it to be patently false just because it is unsubstantiated
Since you were not there, you have not spoken to anyone who was there and you have not spoken to anyone who was involved in the investigation, your denial of my story is less than hearsay."
You are confusing "deny" with "doubt." Nowhere on this thread have I denied your story. I have expressed doubt. I don't know you, and I don't know your informant. Knowing nothing about you or your informant, I am unable to judge the veracity of the allegation that the dead doctor insulted his murderer, and thus, cannot accept the allegation as fact.
You plead:
"Don’t bitch at me as I am just repeating what I heard from a good source."
but then relate an event you did not witness in very biased language:
"Then it came out that our fearless major tried to show off to his friends how much shitty-asshole-GI Korean he could speak after a week or so in-country… so, he spoke the most rude and offensive bar-whore Korean he had learned to a helpless down-and-out homeless person rummaging through trash on the street."
But then I wouldn't expect any better from someone who thinks of a sexual assault as "titties being felt up." Too bad you don't extend the same respect to victims of sexual violence that you do to Koreans. Please clean up your filthy, vulgar language and then come back and lecture us about respect.
Kind of different from:
no?
It "came out" right away that the Korean man "perceived" he was being "insulted" and thus justified in his "righteous Korean rage" to stab a guy to death.
You didn't need "inside" information or substantial hearsay to come up with that.
But, in the first statement, you piss all over this dead guy's grave with glee – pretty much saying he deserved what he got or should have expected what he got or that he was a turd asshole whatever the case might be — just as everybody else (who you don't respect in the expat community) is most likely a shitbag who gets themselves into the trouble they get into in Korea
—– as if you had been standing beside him when the event happened and thus had a pretty definitive idea of what went down.
No……wait…..it wasn't that……..It was your intuitive knowledge gained from experience out with Koreans and the shitbags that led you to describe the MDs death as something he brought on himself and makes you go out of your way to belittle a woman who just got her tits touched and say that was pretty much USFK's fault for not protecting her better….
What an ass…
So, USFK investigators decided that the major said something and the Korean took it as an insult and decided to stab him to death…
The Korean press reported that much, but let's consider who was doing the talking:
Did the other MD friends of the Major say, "Well, I told him not to be cussing the Korean with his shitty-asshole-GI Korean like that, that he was only asking for trouble, but you know Major X, he was just an asshole that way. I told him he was asking for it, and boy did he get it…."
Or, perhaps the investigators who told you the guy deserved it got the information from Koreans who were passing by:
"I couldn't believe the shit that was coming out of that asshole GI's mouth. What a motherfucker!! If it had been me, I'd have grabbed that knife and stabbed him too! Fucking bastard!!"
Or, perhaps it was told by the homeless, mentally ill guy himself – maybe he had a tape recorder with him and got it all on tape – and once hearing the type of language the asshole MD was using, they concluded he deserved a blade in the liver….
Or, maybe, all you heard was that the homeless guy said that the Major insulted him and it really pissed the guy off so he felt justified in attacking the major.
And you decided that was good enough for you to casually spit all over the guy's memory, no?
Well, but then you say you were't saying it was justified and that nothing could have justified a knife to the liver.
You were just pissing on the guy. Not saying he deserved it. Just letting us know you are pretty sure you would despise the guy, like you despise those other scumbags who "frequently get into situations in Korea" and don't defuse them, but puff out their chests instead, and are just begging to get stabbed or beaten or whatnot.
I mean, it is most likely the MDs and Sonagi's fault and mine and the few other expats I know who have been accosted in Korea. It never happened to you or the people "you respect" —- you know, those few non-asshole expats that manage to get to Korea who have to suffer with the masses of ignorant hick or ghetto types invading the country.
But, as you say, this is certainly a waste of time….
Anybody who can be so gung-ho in describing how a GI deserved or should have expected to get stabbed —- and say that he has routinely seen GIs piss all over Koreans in public —– but has never heard of or encountered a
Korean accosting someone "unprovoked" in the street ——- and equates the touching of bar girls to a male sneaking into a female dorm and physically assualting a female —
is a lost cause……..like in saying…
Gee. Don't hurt yourself there —- wouldn't want you to strain a muscle trying to give the most likely bitch GI the same amount of consideration you do the poor homeless of Korea who have to live with the GIs pissing on them all the time….
And yeah, I've always found this kind of odd too:
But it isn't that hard for me to imagine that someone who could be so crass about the MD stabbing and extend so much to the poor Korean homeless man – and then turn around and water down the sexual assault case to just some woman being felt up – and try hard to find a way to say it should have been expected too – I mean, even Ewah U's security would have prevented this – it's kind of USFK's fault, no???-
Yes. I met a couple of people like you in Korea. I worked with one.
A Korean female friend I had met in France came to visit me. She was remarkably beautiful. And as we were walking around the streets of Wonju (I had only been in Korea a couple of weeks) – within two or three hours of each other, I was accosted by 2 Korean men in their 20s at bus stops.
In both cases, the guys were visible furious and got right up in my face. Both with their noses almost touching my face. Neither said a word, but both had clinched fists and were right on top of me to the point people began staring.
In the first case, I was too shocked and stupid to know what to do and just stood there. In the 2nd case, I gingerly backed off, which wasn't easy with the guy on top of me, and we walked away.
My friend said I needed to leave Wonju and move to Seoul or Pusan where you wouldn't have such trouble.
But, my good Canadian friend I was teaching assured us both we must have misunderstood. He walked with Korean female students in the street from time to time, and he'd never felt any pressure. I must have just been over-reacting. There must have been some other reason why my friend decided we wouldn't work around the city any more but take a taxi right away. It was all just a big misunderstanding…
At least you can admit something negative did happen —- it was just my fault, right?
What a ass…
I'm sure I was begging for it too…..I mean, how dare I walk the streets of Korea at around noon and stand at a bus stop talking to a pretty Korean girl I knew?
Didn't I understand Korean culture!!
Why the hell would someone like me come to Korea and not "understand" how some Koreans feel about mixed couples!!
It is me — the waekuk – who basically causes such problems. I should know better. I was just asking for it….
🙂
Put me and the female GI who just got her breast fondled down on your list of shitbags together (along with Songagi)…
I feel quiet comfortable being on that list….
It's an honor to be opposite a turd.
And don't let that ruin your day…..
…..I get the feeling you probably use that line a lot, right?
Probably around all those dickhead waekuks who you despise – as opposed to those few you admire and respect – you know – the ones who have taken the time to know the real Korea – those few 1 or 2 good ones out there…..
Like the Canadian I worked with….which reminds me of this:
Yep. I think I've met a couple of your replicas out there.
Oh, why do you respond? Ahhhh boredom…
"I'm so much superior to all this, but I guess I'll slum awhile…
Me? I insulted the dead? Moi? Why, gosh, nothing I said was offensive! See, this is why those Koreans wanted to bother you. You are just to dense to understand. You can't even read plain English. Why so upset? Tsssst…..You're just another one of those……It's a pity Korea has to witness so many like you coming off the planes….."
I actually got along well enough with the Canadian described above, but I also told him he liked to "push people's buttons."
"Don't let it ruin your day…."
Right, right….
🙂
Oh, and I left off the best part of your story:
"Then it came out that our fearless major tried to show off to his friends how much shitty-asshole-GI Korean he could speak after a week or so in-country… so, he spoke the most rude and offensive bar-whore Korean he had learned to a helpless down-and-out homeless person rummaging through trash on the street.
Except the homeless person wasn’t so helpless. He had the deadly combination of Korean Pride and a kitchen knife. The major got the Gift of Cold Steel in the liver to assist him in minding his own fucking business. Happy Birthday, loudmouth round-eye motherfucker.
Four cuss words in two paragraphs describing a man's stabbing murder, and you complain about “shitbags" and chastise Westerners' "puffed chests and lots of “fuck youâ€s"
You challenged me, "You can also read my writing and determine if I might have the skills necessary to make a good judgment about this person’s speaking. "
I've just reread your description of the doctor's murder – …shitty…asshole… bar-whore…Gift of Cold Steel in the liver…fucking…round-eye motherfucker and have determined that you might not have the skills necessary to make a good judgment about this story. If the US military ever does introduce a "Keep Your Fucking Mouth Shut training class", I hope they don't choose someone like you to teach it.
Wow. You ARE a hater.
It seems my "filthy, vulgar language" has stolen the attention from my message and thrust your focus upon it's delivery. Needlessly, I might add, as a basic familiarity with a few common literary devices might allow a deeper understanding of it's content which is accentuated and not obscured by it's form.
Ah… but I forgot. The biggest crime in today's PC society is to offend. And you have been offended. Your indignation at an apparent lack of respect for victims of sexual violence and the undefending dead has clouded your judgment and substituted emotion for reason as you seek to determine the possibility or probability of the validity of my statements.
The repeated angry references to fondled titties in the last few posts suggest it's great importance to dark and lurking past demons impatiently waiting to angrily show their presence at the slightest provocation. We are offended by what we fear as if anger can mask our insecurity.
To avoid unnecessary damage, may I suggest you check your emotional baggage at the door.
Moving on…
On a blog written by soldiers, for soldiers and about soldiers (and those around soldiers), I am thinking the primary audience is somewhat familiar with vulgarities. Unless Ol' Devil PC has recently crept through all ranks of our armed forces, military English (at least informally) contained a higher percentage of vulgarities than, say, a Sunday school EFL class for Korean middle school girls. Most soldiers are no strangers to words like "titties" or concepts such as "grabbing a handful" when the rare chance arises.
And, while I am certainly capable of writing in the boring and vulgarity-free English which I speak on a daily basis, I'm not quite feeling any guilt for using vulgarities for color and effect in this context as I might if I were addressing a more anally retentive audience.
If you are so terribly offended, you could run along and play on a church blog. You could also choose to ignore it.
Rabid oversensitivity only entices many to speak more enthusiastically of groped titties and punched boobies much in the way the spas kid yelling, "Am not!" encourages the other children to reply, "Are so!"
But kindly overlook my imperfections as a human being.
In accordance with your sensitivities, allow me to rephrase my original post upon which your comments are encouraged.
1. It has been claimed Dr. Berry said something offensive to the homeless man which was provocation for the stabbing. Does anyone have any information on this?
2. While no amount of money can compensate for the ferocity and viciousness involved in the terrible sexual rampage against an innocent sleeping female American GI, one would hope USFK would back her in a civil action to recover some form of monetary damages for the years of suffering and trauma this will bring upon her. Further, I hope pressure is put upon USFK to insure proper safeguards are put in place to negate the possibility of this type of incident occurring in the future.
I hope this satisfies your requirements for a sensitive and respectful post and we can put this needless flame war behind us before we are reminded of that picture of the mentally handicapped child running in the race bordered by an explanation of the pitfalls of arguing on the Internet.
Perhaps, in the future, your vitriol against casualness in dealing with sexual assault would be better channeled toward the human trafficking and forced prostitution happening in front of places like Osan Air Base where titties are groped, boobies are felt, pussies are banged and asses are reamed… and not always with girls who are one hundred percent willing.
I couldn't help but notice a lack of comments with your name attached when those topics come up from time to time. But, of course, it is never to late to do something other than complain.
J!
I don't recall reading anything written by you on previous threads at ROK Drop, but just happened to come across several of your posts at the Lost Nomad.
Since I live in the US, I'm not really in a position to combat human trafficking in Korea. I'd almost believe that you actually care about those women in the bars, but given your vulgar language and snide tone, that's unlikely.
Everyone else is probably already familiar with your trolling and that's why they've been ignoring you.
Troll on!
I miss Silly Sally.
With respect to your inquiry about the stabbing death, I spent a whole two minutes searching at the Korea Times and found these articles about the incident:
http://search.hankooki.com/times/times_view.php?t… stabbed &path=hankooki1/kt_nation/200007/t20000707171655411186.htm&media=kt
http://search.hankooki.com/times/times_view.php?t… stabbed &path=hankooki1/kt_nation/200006/t200006271754334111359.htm&media=kt
http://search.hankooki.com/times/times_view.php?t… stabbed &path=hankooki1/kt_nation/200006/t200006261704524111345.htm&media=kt
If the links don't work, go to the homepage and put "doctor stabbed" into the search box and make sure the beginning date is set to the year 2000.
After reading earlier posts here and at the Lost Nomad, I understand you now, ChickenHead. Love and Peace from your sister Sonagi! 🙂
Sonagi, don't say that, it has been nice around here without Silly Sally.
GI,
Can you free my last comment from the spam trap?
Yup. An ass…
No. Your just as asshole. Not that hard to notice…
And did you really have to waste so much time crafting that strawman?
Vulgarities…..offending me….Yeah…..that was it…
😉
You got me!
All those assholes and fucks and shitheads were just a ruse.
Me trying to throw your higher intellect off so you wouldn't notice the incredible weakness of my PC point.
Dickhead…
How about reading both your 1 and 2 above then going back and re-reading what you wrote in the first comment, and see if you can unglue your head from your rectum long enough to notice some differences.
You can pretend in this last post that the same mind and personality wrote both —– and you can just dismiss the retort as PC bullshit —- but your high disdain showed clearly in the first and is still shining. You can pretend you don't hold hate for the dead doctor of the female who got her tittie groped, but it is obvious. We know which version of yourself was speaking true in which post.
And I do find the examples of you I run across fascinating…
I compare the way you describe how you "asked for" trouble by being with a Korean female in a bar district….
….how you go out of your way to excuse the Korean males and basically leave them out of the picture……
…and I look back at your "non-PC" description of the stabbing of the MD and the groping of the female GI…
Fascinating….
Much more interesting than some PC vs non-PC bullshit smokescreen….
Sonagi, I freed up your comment. I have my Akismet set to moderate any comments that have more than one external link.
I'm glad to see you have kissed and made up with Chickenhead. 🙂
USinKorea,
I believe our brother ChickenHead is misunderstood. GI understands and that's why he's been silent. Brother ChickenHead doesn't need counterarguments. He needs LOVE and PEACE! 😉
On sex slavery —
I'd like to see USFK do as GI Korea says and place all bars or other places with foreign girls working off limits and enforce it by busting the GIs who go into them.
It would cause more trouble than what the one base commander got up in Dongduchong, if I remember correctly, who placed some locations off limits for selling alcohol to minors. The ville shut itself down a few times and put up banners in protest.
If I were the USFK commander, I'd place the bars with foriegn prostitutes off limits – and when the city and then national government complained, I'd tell them to sit on my thumb and spin (—describing it as such to show I'm not much on PC either)…
GIs who go to places where foreign prostitutes work, knowing that a significant percentage of them are not staying in Korea and doing what they do willingly, should be ashamed of themselves, and the soldiers who understand the situation should exert some peer pressure on those others.
What would be really great is if I were the president of Korea.
Then, I'd order the immigration people to stop issuing entertainment visas like that, and I'd have the embassies in the SE Asian and Russian area nations where most of the sex slaves (and non-slave prostitutes) come from to be more careful in issuing visas of any kind that involve females from those nations.
Then, I'd have my police in areas where their are USFK villes, as well as in other areas well-known for prostitution and that have foreign sex workers too, bust up the joints. I'd have raid after raid, and I'd put the business people profitting off the sex industry in jail.
If I happened to catch some GIs in the act as I was raiding these places, I'd prosecute them under Korean law.
Of course, this would take a sea-change in prosecutorial habit because I would also be throwing Korean Johns (or Kims) in jail as well as the Korean and foreign prostitutes (the ones who were most likely there to make a buck instead of being held against their will) and the business owners.
If I were in charge, I'd attack the problem big time.
And I would be a lot more effective at it if I were a Korean in some of the key positions in Korean government….like the president or the governor of Kyonggi Province, or the mayor of Paju or Seoul or the police chief of one of these cities…..
Being the head of USFK, I could crack down on my own by sending the MPs out to watch the off limits clubs and grab any GIs I found sneaking in or out.
That would have an impact.
But, the USFK boss doesn't have the real authority to attack the problem like it should be attacked.
I'm not much in the mood for peace and love these days.
I've just scaled back my grad school classes since my father has been given about a month to live, and I am coming to do some blogging to take my mind off the stress.
Chickenhead is doing me a great service.
But, I'd still be calling him a bleepity bleep under the best of circumstances…
How many times can I use "their" for "there" or "your" for "you're" and so on?
I've gotten worse with it over the past few months.
I think my mind is subconsciously rebelling against all the brainless grammar lessons I've been seeing out in the schools…..yeah…..that's it….that's the ticket….
And yes…
….at times I am a hater………bullshit tends to get on my nerves from time to time, and I don't mind saying it…….
😡
I'm very sorry to hear about your father. Love and strength to you and your family during this difficult time.
USinKorea, That does suck about your dad, sorry to hear about it. All the best to you.
Thanks for your thoughts…
Wow… some people take me WAY too seriously. Relax, guys. This is just verbal grab-ass on the Internet. Apart from delivery, our basic ideas don't seem so divergent.
Sonagi,
I have been vocally against human trafficking and forced prostitution at Osan Air Base since 1999 when it first came to my attention. A simple search of the Internet documents this for the last 3 or 4 years when I became more public about it.
"I’d almost believe that you actually care about those women in the bars, but given your vulgar language and snide tone, that’s unlikely."
Whatever your belief, it seems I have attempted to do more to stop sexual assaults and sexual exploitation than you have. Perhaps this is less important to you than vulgarity and snideness. Or maybe your emotion got in the way of formulating your priorities.
"Since I live in the US, I’m not really in a position to combat human trafficking in Korea."
Now that is an excuse, Sonagi. Shame. A letter to your congressman is just that much cheaper. There is no shortage of information on the Internet about what is going on. Further, you have the resources of a blog full of people who might share up-to-date information with you in your fight to stop forced sexual exploitation supported by the United States military.
This is much more productive than complaining to me about vulgarity and calloused remarks… and much more fulfilling than making excuses why you can't do anything.
After looking at the links you provided, I am a bit perplexed as to your point. Everything was exactly as I reported. The provoking insult seems to be a he-said-they-said kind of thing. I can certainly see the GIs claiming nothing was said and I can see the homeless guy claiming they offended him. Which is true? I don't know. A USFK member involved in the investigation believed something was said. I find the odds higher that a snide comment was made than the homeless guy decided to stab the first person he saw… but that is only my opinion…
…and that is why I requested additional input from anyone who might be able to correct the story.
As for delivery, grow a thicker skin. Life will be easier.
We all need love and peace, Sister Sonagi. May you get yours as well.
usainkorea,
Your screeds never fail to entertain as they always personally attack me and, in this case, my style of delivery, as well. Combined with a skirting of the issues being discussed (did the doctor say something which provoked the attack or not, does USFK have any responsibility to protect female GIs from sexual assault) your writing always makes for entertaining diversion.
But you are a bit of a paradox. As soon as you are finished destroying me, everything I have done, everything I have said and everything I stand for, you then write a post which sounds like we worked on it together over cold beers. Interesting. Should we be arguing?
One good point you made, which I should address, is how I "excused" the Korean punks for insulting me. Let's look at it from their point of view.
I'm walking with a beautiful girl and they are not. I can get another beautiful girl any time, they can't and they know both these facts. On top of this, they have no chance with a Western woman. Anger and frustration are rasonable emotions.
Perhaps "excuse" is a less accurate word than "understand". In the end, I got action, they didn't. To feel superior, do I need to win some kind of pissing match? No.
Now, contrast this with why I understand but don't excuse GIs/teachers/etc for the same type of behavior… it is Korea's country and not America's country. Americans living in Korea must be held to a higher standard of behavior than the natives. For our own national pride and image, if not for general good manners. It's possible… it just requires everyone to be cool for a year.
Before you hit your keyboard and scream UNFAIRNESS, be aware we do this in America as well and nobody thinks anything of it… in fact there are even different standards based on skin color.
Now, one of the reasons I live in Korea is that it ISN'T cool to be an asshole like it is in the States. We can discuss this in great detail in the forum of your choice… but I imagine most people know what I'm talking about.
I haven't had the same kind of conflict in Korea that you have had. I'm hoping there are more people who fit into my category than yours… but I don't know. I'm hoping there are a bunch of people out there going, "Gee, how the hell DO you get into a fight in this country?" But maybe I am the exception.
I must add that many of the people I know who get into regular conflicts are the same people who are easily offended (both you and Sonagi seem to fit into this category).
They are the same people who think every stare on the street is due to critical scrutiny (as opposed to pale skin and big, round eyes). They think every Korean conversation that ends in a glance and a giggle is some insulting comment against them which will affect their lives. They think every 5 year-old who says "fuck you", while flipping a bird, fully understands and means it instead of just trying to provoke a reaction based on what he saw on the latest Hollywood movie. They think every conversation with a native is a sophisticated trap to lead them into conflict.
I don't know. I don't see it that way.
All that aside, usinkorea, I'm sorry about your father. Whatever kind of bleepity bleep I may be, I am still aware of the value of fathers and I hope for the best concerning yours.
J!
@ ChickenHead,
So you're a public activist? Real name? Links? I'm curious to read more.
You seriously suggested writing a letter to my Congressman about human trafficking? I've already written several letters about the war in Iraq and participated in one anti-war demonstration after moving near DC a few months ago. Yes, a large volume of mail on a topic can make a difference. A handful does not. Moreover, no one can fight against every injustice. My big issue is the war in Iraq, which has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and plunged a country into sectarian violence. If you really are an activist, power to you, brother. In the meantime, I will continue my modest anti-war activism.
As for the articles I provided, the police also described the man as "mentally unstable" and "deranged." Maybe the doctor did say something. Maybe he didn't. Even the police said they couldn't be sure what happened. Given Korean press coverage of USFK incidents, if there was substantiating evidence that the doctor provoked the fight, it likely would have appeared in the stories. The murder happened at 3 PM and there were other bystanders besides the three doctors.
Please be careful about making generalizations based on a few internet posts. Many of the Koreans I know would be deeply offended by your vulgar language and description of the murder. Maybe you think Koreans are "easily offended" too. You seem to be one of those expats who thinks he understands and respects Koreans more than his fellow expats. "They think every stare…they think every Korean…they think every 5-yr-old…they think every…" If you are affiliated with the military, then I can understand why you might feel that way. As a former university lecturer, I interacted mostly with well-educated, well-mannered Koreans and expatriates. I knew a few expatriates who fit those "they think" statements but not many.
BTW, I really do want to know more about your activism. I can't do an internet search if I don't know your real name.
ChickenHead wrote:
"On top of this, they have no chance with a Western woman. Anger and frustration are rasonable emotions."
Speaking as a Western woman who dated Korean men and whose Western female friends dated, made love with, and sometimes married Korean men, it is not true that Korean men really "have no chance" with a Western woman. They might feel that way, but it's not because they've been rejected time and time again. It would be more true to say that some Korean men would date to date Western women but either 1) don't know any; or 2) don't have the courage/language skills to pursue a relationship.
First, thanks for the thoughts about my dad, and I mean that.
I would also say I would not say you as a whole are a bleepity bleep, but I do find your thoughts on the topic at hand to be a fairly sized and stinking pile of poo…
And I did and still do find your crass expressions concerning the dead MD (and less so the female GI) to be rather full of shit and deserving a retort along the same lines.
And yes, if you were one of my friends and we were out at a bar and you said something like that, you would get pretty much exactly what I've said so far in pretty much exactly that same manner, regardless of whose time it was to buy the next round of drinks, but if you were generally just some stranger, I'd probably just chalk you up as a lost cause and make my exit.
No. That is dead wrong, and it is approaching the heart of the issue.
I figured since you were into non-PC exchanges, you'd be able to see my points and point of view and how it is opposed to yours, but I guess I'll have to scale it back —- and just stick with the condescending tone to align with you again —- and see if communication is improved.
This is the heart of it, and it is an opinion I believe is complete bullshit.
And it is one of the items that comes up a couple of times a year in the expat Korea blogsphere – and I voice my opinion about it pretty much the same each time…
It is this core philosophy of yours — that so easily allows you to piss all over the dead MD GI. And I attack your crass demeaning of his death, because he can't, and unless the female GI runs across this, she can't either, and you deserved what you gave out thrown back at you.
All that stuff about how you were simply trying to discuss whether the doctor said something bad to the homeless man and how USFK needs to protect its female soldiers better is a crock — as much as this meaningless peace out stuff you use as a shield apparently to try to prevent people from coming back at you once your through dropping your charge verbiage.
I guess it is an effective strategy at times — Pissing on a dead guy's grave and belittling a woman who was sexually assaulted who is highly unlikely to come across what you have to say is a more sure fire thing, except if somebody like me decides to take offense and shoot back.
But, you went on from there.
Your tone and attitude you demonstrated fits exactly with your core idea that Korea is not the expat's nation and the expat should shut up and learn to "endure" it (as the Koreans would say) – and the only people who don't learn to get along with it are most likely just asshole foreigners to begin with who should have expected/deserved whatever treatment they got.
And you feel so strongly about this, you justify Korean bigotry against even yourself.
That is fine enough for you and whoever else wants to live by that philsophy (and I have seen a few (though not many) expats in Korea who did try hard to live by it.
If that makes the sun shine for you each day in Korea when you get out of bed, more power to you, but I feel just fine firing back at that attitude when it is extended out to others — you know —- that mass group of expats you feel superior to who you denigrate – like the doctor, the female GI, and I guess pretty much any other expat you hear talking about some problem they might have had out among the Koreans.
It's Korea's country – so just shut up and accept it —-
I hate this same attitude here in the States.
I live in an area that has seen a massive influx of Hispanics to work in the carpet industry: immigrants, migrants, permanent residents, illegals, the works.
And if I were sitting in a bar, and I saw some white guy deciding it was his right by birth and nationality to start a bunch of shit with some Hispanics – say a Hispanic male with a white girl – because they are probably illegal and this in not their country to begin with and whatever, I'd feel the same way about them as I do you when you write about how it is acceptable when Koreans do that to immigrants in their own nation.
And if the person being the bigot was my friend, I'd cuss him about it right there in front of everybody, and depending on how far the bigot was pushing things, there is a fair chance I'd stand up and say something to him about it even if everybody involved was a complete stranger to me.
Which means or can be extended into saying that I believe this part below is BS too:
Nobody thinks anything of it….
Hmmmmm….
Fascinating….
Maybe I'm starting to understand what you think about blacks and Hispanics and Asians and whatever minority that doesn't match your own skin color? Is that it?
You might want to explain a little more about what you mean here, because I could start trying to logically extend the meaning based on what I've read so far in this thread, and it is starting to sound like it wouldn't lead to a pretty place.
It is starting to paint an even more unflattering image of you in my mind, and I'd like some more specifics before going there.
No. Please. Extend yourself. We're getting somewhere, and I find it terribly interesting, but I am also confused (really – I'm not trying to be a smartass – at least not right here)…
You say Americans in Korea should hold themselves up to higher standards, but you also seem to be suggesting that Koreans do/should hold Americans (and other foreigners) to higher or different standards.
You are also saying that American society holds — which is it — immirgrants or any non-white skin color? —- to a higher or different standard, A-N-D nobody minds that.
But, you say that one thing you like about Korea is that it isn't cool to be an asshole like it is in the States….
I'm lost……..which type of asshole are we talking about?
First, though, I think a fair porition of Americans would object to the idea that nobody in American objects to bigoted ideas like mixed couples are offensive.
I think there is a significant portion of the American people who think holding immigrants to a higher standard and accosting them when they don't live up to that standard is wrong.
I'm lost…
You say it is fine if a Korean bigot gets in your face because you are with a pretty Korean female, and you expected that kind of thing, and you were asking for it to cut against a common Korean prejudice…and you simply got what you were asking for…
But, you say, for example, I guess, if an American bigot started getting in the Korean woman's face for being with an American, it would be wrong…
….or right?
—— you said Americans can't act like Koreans in Korea — that they shouldn't expect to be able to act like Koreans in Korea – and that you belittle those who do act like Koreans when you don't belittle the Koreans for the same actions — and the mixed couple was the most concrete example.
So, if a Korean is in the US with a white member of the opposite sex, does that mean an American bigot has free reign on them?
When you say it isn't cool to be an asshole in Korea as it is in the States, what do you mean? Give some examples of actions, because I'm sitting here reading and rereading this comment along with the others, and I can't figure out what you mean….
I was with you fully when you were saying that expats can't act just like Koreans and expect not to face some Korean wrath ——- for those very same acts —- because it isn't our country….
…then down a little later you are saying you like Korea more because it isn't cool to be an asshole in Korea as it is in the States…
Which would seem to imply that you are there saying that the expats in Korea are acting worse than Koreans and that is why it is uncool and they get called for it?
Or, is this where your higher standards kick in?
The foreigner in Korea (and the US) must act better than the natives, and if they don't, if the natives decide to call the foreigner up for not toeing the "you are the foreign guest here, buddy!" line – then it is just natural and acceptable that the bigot gets in the foreigner's face?
And that includes conforming to Korean society's standards – whatever they might be – like on mixed couples.
I need clarifiction…
Next,
No. Off again.
Where you and I are on the same page is how we at least say we have handled confrontations in Korea.
I too "endured".
I've even had my shirt sleeve and chest pocket pushed and pulled on by a drunk Korean, much like I have seen drunk Korean men push and pull on each other in disagreements, and I simply "endured" until his grip relaxed and I could make my exit.
Do you consider that an encounter? Or does it have to escalate into punches or kicks or slaps before you count it as an encounter and then it is the expats fault for letting it escalate?
I generally found if I went out and about in Korea a good bit by myself, sightseeing and taking pictures or walking home after leaving from a night out with Korean friends or students, I would have 1 or 2 run ins a year with a Korean with a chip on his shoulder.
Certainly not enough to warrant leaving the country or ascribing such behavior to all or most Koreans.
But certainly not the kind of attention that should be "understood" because it is that Korean's homeland and I'm a guest.
Next,
First, this whole last part is moving again to saying that you naturally seem to label anybody you hear who has had an incident in Korea the same as someone who "always" gets offended by just about everything.
Back in the mid and late 1990s, I did run across a few expat teachers who were unnerved by being stared at. That was back also when the ESL market had not exploded and there were far fewer expats around. The guy I replaced in Wonju had been the first and only native English speaking teacher in the whole city a year and a half before (around 1994).
But, those were the exceptions. Most of the expats I knew didn't complain about every little stare, but did manage to find fault with Koreans when – say – they were with a Korean female and some bigoted Korean male decided to say something about it….
Anyway, back to the 5 year old…
Fascinating…
Maybe some of us stop to think that the 5 year old is applying both what he just saw in a Hollywood movie with a hefty dose of bigotry he got from home? which might have been reinforced here and there in the pop culture and in the schools?
I'd feel safe in saying that any 5 year-old white kid in my neighborhood who used some derogatory Spanish slang they picked up from Spanish TV or some movie with a lot of Hispanics in it (or mimicing some of the old Luney Toones Speedy Gonzales cartoons) — was expressing some racism picked up in the home — that is part of a larger problem in my area (though we can debate its extent here (or the same thing in Korea).
This should help explain my own position here, and I haven't really laid it out like this any of the times this topic has come up over the years.
Here in the US, I see no problem with a Korean Town in LA or NY or a China Town in SF and other cities.
I see no problem with the fact, now that the Hispanic population in the classes I was teaching in the city middle school is 30-50% of the total students, that Mexicans and Guatamalans have enough people and resources around them (that make them feel more comfortable), they are carving out a social sector of their own – by which I mean, you see more Hispanic shops and groceries and you see more groups out at the soccer fields —- that you see them setting up shop in their own way based on their own heritage (as well as mixing in the new land).
I think it would be wise to gain the skills (skills that can lead to assimilation), because there are so many more opportunities in the United States besides what your community can carve out here and there, but if carving out is what they want, they have that right – immigrant or naturalized citizen.
I think it would be better for expats in Korea to learn more about Korean society and culture and the language – especially if they plan to be there for more than a couple of years —
but it is not mandatory, and there is no way in hell their not being Korean means they should just accept it when they face bullshit from Koreans.
I see no crucial problem with GIs deciding to hang around with other GIs and not boneing up on Korean culture. I would encourage them to do it, but if they want to spend their time hanging out with each other much like they would in the states, fine.
That doesn't excuse bad things they or anybody does.
But, groups do tend to stick together.
I lived in an internatinal dorm in France, and these were people highly eager to meet and get to know people from all over the world, but they still clumped together. You saw it at meal time. You could divide the room and tables up into sections and even nationalities based on cultural closeness.
And the reason I thought to type this out, as I was about to log off, something I read in Colin Powell's book popped into my head:
he talked about being black in the US and from an immigrant family, and he talked about how sometimes when he was at some big get together with the military base community, when he and other black soldiers were joking and laughing, he would feel the need to walk over to some of the white officers and tell them, "It's Okay. We're just enjoying ourselves."
What he was talking about is that even though blacks and whites have been in the US for a long time together (though of course segragation and racism kept them apart until fairly recently), there are still just some cultural differences – and that is all just fine.
A couple of clarifications:
1. My anti-human trafficking/forced prostitution was much more quiet, for obvious reasons, when I was in front of Osan Air Base. Apart from customer testimony, the only thing that can be publicly documented is a clever and humorous e-mail I wrote to my mailing list on Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:40:22 -0800 (PST) explaining the juicy game and Osan Air Base's involvement (filled with sarcasm and irony but no vulgarity) which got forwarded around the Air Force. It brought unwanted attention and probably is one of the bricks in the wall of my demise.
Although you wish to draw some sort of conclusion concerning the timing of my more public fight against human trafficking, forced prostitution and corrupt members of the United States military who ensure it continues, don't confuse the messenger with the message.
My statements and conclusions are right or wrong. There are bars engaged in human trafficking and forced prostitution with a customer base of only United States servicemembers that are not being placed off limits in front of Osan Air Base. Or there aren't. Attack this, not me or my motivations. It is happening or it isn't.
If you are truly against sexual crimes with the same ferocity you used against my choice of words in describing one, you should support me on this issue and not try to undermine the message by looking for ways to nitpick the messenger.
2. My thoughts on Westerners in Korea should be clarified.
I am more critical of foreigners' than locals' behavior in Korea for a number of reasons; none of which are because I am a Korean apologist.
The primary reason is that this is Korea, it is filled with Koreans and it has a long history of doing things the Korean Way. My interaction with Korea mirrors my expectations for non-Americans in the United States.
I expect foreigners in America to contribute what they can, not try to change my country into what they left behind, stay out of trouble and keep their critical mouthes shut about what Americans do in America. While I am thankful for the positive cultural contributions of tequila and backbacon, I don't want to hear Mexicans complaining there are no government forms in Spanish and I don't want to hear Canadians complaining there are too many guns. Gun-free Canada and Spanish-speaking Mexico are just a border away. Off you go.
This doesn't mean I gush about everything Korean. But, as a guest, I don't have the right to forcefully change anything and, like with any guest, complaining is not appreciated. I put up, shut up and try to minimize it's affect on me. And, in the end, no matter how many times a pushy ajuma gets an elbow in the gut, I'm guessing the crowd will still try to get on the subway or elevator before the other crowd gets off.
But there is hope. Korean society is evolving rather rapidly and, for the most part, in a positive way (children's behavior being a notable exception). If I don't like the direction it goes, there are several hundred other countries to choose from until I find one where I don't feel the need to bitch, bitch, bitch about my host nation and the people who live there.
Leading through exemplary behavior can be my biggest contribution (several of my Korean friends now open the car doors for their wives after seeing my example (well, after the wives saw my example)).
However, as a foreigner in Korea, I have the right to push for higher standards in foreigners-in-Korea behavior (as, presumably, they have the right to tell me to go shit in my hat). Foreigners who come to Korea and cause needless trouble make my life in Korea needlessly more difficult.
Foreigners in Korea draw more attention due to being foreigners. A higher degree of scrutiny concerning their actions happens… fair or not, like it or not. For this reason a higher standard of public behavior is necessary for foreigners, such as Americans, who have nothing to gain by being noticed as assholes… especially in a world where Brand America is becoming increasingly tarnished. Consider my complaints about American's bad behavior a form a patriotism.
Every one of us is an ambassador from our country and it is our duty to be on our best behavior when dealing with our host nation.
"You seem to be one of those expats who thinks he understands and respects Koreans more than his fellow expats."
In a way that is true. While this does not apply to my feelings about "average" Americans in America, the majority of "average" Americans in Korea which are most noticeable are relatively young, generally from a below-average socio-economic demographic and lack the social structure that might have modified their behavior "back home".
They consist primarily of low-ranking GIs followed by English "teachers" with no long-term plans to stay. More frequently than not, they treat Korea as place to do their time or make money with no thought to the longer-term consequences of their actions as, for the most part, Korea is a consequence-free environment (cops won't arrest you for being drunk in public… or much else).
While I understand this, I'm disappointed how, as a noticeable group, it gives a bad impression to Koreans about who Westerners really are.
I don't notice the foreigners who make some effort to assimilate to Korean society as I expect foreigners in America to assimilate to American society. I notice the group of five Westerners dress in gangsta fashion standing on the street and making drunken catcalls to girls who walk by. So do the locals.
I feel I have the right to complain about this behavior.
(Disclaimer: Of course, there are THOUSANDS of brilliant and well-behaved foreigners in Korea and I am perfectly aware of this. But these aren't the ones I am speaking of, am I? I am speaking of the others who draw bad attention and seem to be followed by conflict).
I may take heat for holding this position but I can take it. Apart from personal attacks, I would love for someone to tell me why my thinking is wrong in a clear and logical way.
3. As for Korean men and Western women, there are millions and millions of Korean men. Available Western women number in the tens of thousands or less… even fewer when you subtract the ones that are working their way though the shit-hot, hard-bodied GIs that would never even talk to them in the States due to issues with fat, ugliness and stringy hair.
Young, Korean street punks with no English skills have (statistically) no chance with Western women. They might not even have much of a chance with Korean women.
You don't have to argue with everything I write, Sonagi.
J!
And that is where the source of our disagreement lies, but I'll leave it with what I wrote above with just a repeat that I dislike the guest analogy when it is applied to anything other than some self-motivater to be on better behavior, because immigrants, migrants, whatever are not "guests" in somebody's house – they are people in another nation – and to treat them as outsiders with a whole other set of judgement criteria and standards is almost the text book definition of racism, isn't it?
Anyway, another saying that is particularly common I don't like is "You have to earn respect." That is fundamentally against what I believe. I believe every individual deserves respect — until they earn your disrespect, and if everybody would follow that advice, everybody in Korea (and elsewhere) would be happier and better off.
I don't expect foreigners in the US to anything more than obey our laws and be treated the same under our laws. I am against illegal immigration and giving benefits to illegal immigrants, but as for the legal immigrants, migrants, and tourists, they can behave as they like.
If I think what they are doing in public is wrong, I think its wrong. But, if I see a white or black guy doing the same and I don't think it is wrong, then I'm being bigoted.
If the immigrants, migrants, and tourists want to complain about things they see or believe they see in the US, more power to them. I'll address the complaints as they come and with whatever level of dialog I think the issue and the way they complain merits.
ChickenHead wrote:
"If I don’t like the direction it goes, there are several hundred other countries to choose from until I find one where I don’t feel the need to bitch, bitch, bitch about my host nation and the people who live there."
Said the man who makes a living off "low-ranking GIs followed by English “teachers†with no long-term plans to stay"
If you don't like the ville, there are several hundred other places to live and work in Korea, where you won't feel the need to bitch about the lowest forms of expat life.
As the Neutral Reader, I declare Chickenhead to have made the final telling post.
USinkorea avoided the facts, and failed to make any factual statements of argument. He won't mind being marginalized, because he apparently doesn't feel he needs to earn anyone's respect. Too bad, the rest of the world thinks he does.
Sonagi's final point, like many of her other posts, is just senseless venom, also avoiding factual argument and merely attacking emotional semantics. While Sonagi's earlier points about Chickenhead's bias and hypocrisies in the depiction of the 2002 murder were valid, Chickenhead restated his points factually and made a challenge:
"I may take heat for holding this position but I can take it. Apart from personal attacks, I would love for someone to tell me why my thinking is wrong in a clear and logical way."
Chickenhead believes that foreigners in Korea should practice restraint in their behavior and be aware of cultural relativism, and he recognizes that our behavior is closely scrutinized by a biased Korean media.
I agree.
Gee, Bluecor, do you think perhaps the fact that you agree with his opinion might have played a factor?
And which are the facts you are speaking about?
We were in a factual argument? I guess I must be dense, because I thought we ended up arguing opinion…
And I would say you are slightly off on Chickenhead's statement of his opinion too, but I see some ambiguity in the term "cultural relativism."
What do you mean specifically by that?
Chickenhead said more than simply foreigners should practice restraint.
He said it is fine if foreigners are held to a higher standard than Koreans hold themselves, and if the foreigners don't like it, tough tittie, it isn't their country and they have no basis for complaint.
A specific example he gave was being in a bar with a Korean female.
To him, he was asking for trouble and the fact he got some on a couple of occasions is no fault of Korea's but his own because he knew of the Korean prejudice beforehand.
If you think that if a swell opinion, fine.
I don't.
And if you don't give respect to people you meet naturally but make them "earn it", fine again.
I went looking for these elusive facts…
Didn't have much luck…
I know I was attacking not facts but the manner in which he pissed on a dead man.
And since you here state you agree with Sonagi's attack on that very same point, I would have to guess you mean Chickenhead's "facts" are that the dead MD GI said something disparging to the homeless guy and that is why he was stabbed to death.
But, I think both Sonagi and I stated "facts" that that he said/he said information was in the press from day one and unless his insider in the investigation gave him much more to go on, he is pissing on the man's grave unjustly —– which would be our opinion…
And it is a point of fact Chickenhead agreed it boiled down to a he said/he said situation.
So, I wonder where these definative facts are that I've ignored discussing that justify Chickenhead's opinion that foreigners are justly held to a higher standard by Koreans because it is their country to do with as they please?
Or, are you saying that Chickenhead laid out subsequent facts that justified his initial pissing on the dead guy's grave?
….since that is what I know got me to jump into this discussion with a full head of steam, and I'm pretty sure that was what Sonagi was attacking….
I went looking for these elusive facts…
Didn't have much luck…
I know I was attacking not facts but the manner in which he pissed on a dead man.
And since you here state you agree with Sonagi's attack on that very same point, I would have to guess you mean Chickenhead's "facts" are that the dead MD GI said something disparging to the homeless guy and that is why he was stabbed to death.
But, I think both Sonagi and I stated "facts" that this he said/he said information was in the press from day one and unless his insider in the investigation gave him much more to go on, he is pissing on the man's grave unjustly —– which would be our opinion…
And it is a point of fact Chickenhead agreed it boiled down to a he said/he said situation.
So, I am wondering what the facts are you see and which part of the argument they provide a winning justification for….???….
Did Chickenhead prove with facts that foreigners should take whatever a Korean dishes out to them and endure it, because they are foreigners?
USinKorea,
Brother ChickenHead is fond of changing socks.
Is that the case?
Cause I looked over at bluecar's site, and that doesn't sound like Chickenhead.
I thought Chickenhead was the former soldier who had a bar (or bars) near US bases?
I hadn't noticed the blog link. Bluecor is no sock, but he's probably a buddy of ChickenHead's. He suddenly appears out of the blue (pun intended), claims neutrality, yet spews ad hominem attacks against ChickenHead's opponents rather than actually offering any objective counterarguments. His writing style and tone are very much like ChickenHead's, too.
Somewhere way up on the thread, Brother ChickenHead wisely reminded us that we shouldn't take internet debates too seriously.
[…] sentence given to a ROK soldier for a sexual assault on a female GI. (for an update on the case go here) This case, and the fact that I have scaled back my college courses and student-teaching due to a […]
Damn I'm so sad that this is so old. ChickenHead is funny as hell.
You can't rape the willing….
Chickenhead is a euphemism… Should be CS…
The only reason to slam murder and rape victims is a low self esteem. One that cannot be lifted by one's own accomplishments, only by denigrating others…
Such a one is not worthy of anything more than contempt.
IMHO, Bluecor, jj, and skippy seem to be cut from the same cloth. The reason doesn't matter; but their lack of common decency leads me to believe they're either either lonely trolls or sadists…
A real wet fart of a comment. Do you really think this ROK soldier did more than try to cop a feel or grab a titty?
Have you ever seen korean soldiers together? It's like the Tinkerbell Parade, they hang off each other like middle schoolers and are more interested in starcraft than getting a piece of ass.
If this guy really did dinky dunk he wouldn't have gotten off easy.
Only two things come from Texas…
…and, euphemistically speaking, hooves are reaaaaal hard to type with.
Silly jtb-in-texas…
…there was no rape victim because, well, there was no rape.
And, nobody was slammed for being a murder victim…
…somebody was slammed because the preponderance of the evidence and the laws of probablility suggest they ran their mouth.
If you have information to the contrary, please share it.
J!
Sexual Assuault means rape. Grow a pair, wouldya?
Your lack of understanding about Texas is understandable, given your undoubtedly poor study habits. I have some friends here in Korea that would be happy to provide you some personal instruction.
Mind you, I just live in Texas, I'm not "from" Texas… but I did get there as fast as I could…
Item 1: blaming the murder victim
ChickenHead Feb 17th, 2007 at 2:28 am
"Hmmm…
Somebody who was involved in the investigation told me the
whole story including Marjor Berry showing off his Korean
language skills. As my memory was accurate for the rest of
the story, I imagine this aspect is accurate, too.
Don’t bitch at me as I am just repeating what I heard from a
good source."
Item 2: blaming the rtape victim
skippy Oct 10th, 2007 at 3:18 pm
You can’t rape the willing….
In both cases, the victim was blamed, not the perpetrator. And, in CS's previous, he as much as stated that if he had the S kicked out of him, it would be okay because he "ran his mouth" (figuratively speaking)…
This type of humor is decidedly low-brow at best and–even given Skippy's attempt to call all ROK soldiers gay was just a joke–very dangerous if the law in this country allows the use of deadly force over an insult but prohibits the use in self-defense…
I wouldn't go out at night if I were either of you…
Ahhh… jtb.
“The woman in the next bunk, who was sleeping in her T-shirt and underwear, later said she struck the soldier after waking up to his touch, said Willey — who quickly turned on her cell-phone light and saw a man running out the door.”
Rpae? If the witness, who was awake and saw the entire incident from start to finish, is being honest, probably not. A little common sense might also assist one in determining the low probability of an actual rpae under the conditions reported in S&S.
“Sxeaul Assuault means rape. Grow a pair, wouldya?”
It is true that Texas Penal Code (22.011) defines sxeual assault as rpae… so your misunderstanding is acceptable.
A dictionary definition, however, is, “Sxeual assault is any physical contact of a sxeual nature without voluntary consent.” Perhaps that is what is being used to describe this situation.
Would it be trolling to suggest that no sxeual assault occurred if the Korean soldier’s actions were based on anatomical curiosity rather than sxeual gratification?
Nevermind. Next topic.
“Your lack of understanding about Texas is understandable, given your undoubtedly poor study habits. I have some friends here in Korea that would be happy to provide you some personal instruction.”
Well, I guess those undoubtedly poor study habits explain why I never went much past the 6th grade. You got me there.
I’m not sure what “personal instruction” might mean. Perhaps they intend to cook me a nice big Texas ribeye? Or demonstrate the freedoms inspired by John Geddes Lawrence? Q.E.D.
“Item 1: blaming the murder victim”
jtb, jtb, jtb…
You misunderstand. There is a difference between blaming a victim and explaining why misfortune befell them. Once again, there is nothing he could have said which “deserved” a stabbing… but there are things he could have said to a crazy person which got him one.
He can’t be “blamed” for the unreasonable actions of another.
But… he DID get stabbed to death… and there IS a reason.
Based on knowledge and belief, I feel it is probable he said something offensive to the stabber. This doesn’t take the “blame” away from the stabber and place it on the stabee… but it provides a reasonable explanation for the motivation behind an unusual act.
Despite a lot of whining, nobody has proposed a sensible counter-theory or even given any reason why my theory can’t be true.
There was no emphasis in my writing on specifically blaming the stabber as it is rather self-evident. My mistake not to pander to the needs of the simple-minded. So… yes… the stabber gets the blame. The end.
Once again, many of the problems I see between GI Joe and Mr. Kim are based on a large helping of mouth-running with a generous side of cultural insensitivity.
I think USFK puts too much effort into creating non-existent problems which they can easily give the appearance of “solving” instead of putting effort into dealing with problems like these. This is accentuated with a policy of chasing GI Joe out of the Villes and into curfew-less Real Korea where actual damage can be done. It will take a dead taxi driver or a couple more raped grandmothers (or, more specifically, mainstream outrage) before USFK leadership huffs and puffs, blames the System and makes Draconian, yet mostly-ineffective, knee-jerk reactions so paperwork and media releases can be generated which show the problem is aggressively being “solved”.
“And, in CS’s previous, he as much as stated that if he had the S kicked out of him, it would be okay because he “ran his mouth” (figuratively speaking)”
Certainly not… but there might be those who shook their heads and said, “Well, he DID run his mouth. I can see why it happened.”
“I wouldn’t go out at night if I were either of you…”
Sure… with all your queeer Texan friends running around under the guise of “cow tippin’” (wink, wink), I’m scared to death to go out after dark.
J!
OMG!!!!
I just stumbled on to this site and one of you mentioned a US GI who got 30 years sentence from raping a KATUSA soldier…. I WAS IN THAT PLDC NCO training school and saw all those dudes who raped him… (no, not the actual rape scene). It was Feb-March training of 2002 PLDC course in Camp Jackson.
The offenders were totaled four GIs, and I believe the one that got the 30 years is a US born Thai or Laos guy (yes I remember him clearly), and two or three blacks. I did not want to associate with them from the very beginning, as they all acted like street gangsters.
What's worst, the exact bathroom that the KATUSA got assaulted was a same creepy bathroom that I used often during the training at late night. This bathroom was located far side and was often empty.
About 2 months after the school was finished, I was called in by a Korean investigator who told me what exactly happened and asked me for some verification. I gave him my only copy of the 'Group Picture' of the NCO candidates that had faces of all the students. He asked me point out the South East Asian looking guy with gangster-like behavior, and I pointed the Asian dude. He also asked me to point out the other blacks and I was able to point one or two, but was difficult with the picture containing about 150 soldiers’' small faces. He borrowed the picture from me but never gave me back the picture as he promised however. There were one or two other soldiers who got called in for verification regarding the incident from my unit of soldiers who attended the school.
Gosh… after all these years, I guess that man got 30 years huh… I did see some news about the incident right after, but did not know the final result.
[…] want outrageous this case is outrageous. I can also point to the case of the ROK Army soldier who sexually assaulted a female US soldier on Camp Casey while she was sleeping and he to received no jail time. If you look at past […]
[…] 5. ROK Army Sexual Assault Update […]
She must have been horribly ugly and they considered it punishment served. All joking aside…I hardly hear about bad things happening to US soldiers other than soldiers doing bad things. Not only does the korean side put a slant on the news but so does the PR department for USFK by being more delicate with how they deal with korean matters. THey tread too softly and now they shine so brightly our image just withers and dies in the harsh sun.
I'm such poet.
[…] physically grab women walking down the street as well as the results after foreign women to include USFK females actually are sexually assaulted by these Korean men and nothing happens to […]
used to play Airsoft but i stopped after some guy accidentally shot my eye `
This is time I should be working, but I ended up over here when it was linked to from another post. Seeing Sonagi call out ChickenHead as a “troll” who “probably one of those Koreans who believes internet rumors about how the two GIs deliberately ran over the two girls and laughed about it later,” was a bit surprising.
I have no idea if what CH said about the doctor using disrespectful language is true, but it would certainly not justify what happened to him. Using foul or disrespectful language should be avoided just because it can lead to unpredictable escalations, but it wouldn’t justify any violence.
I knew an older teacher in Korea who spoke little Korean despite having lived in Korea for at least eight years. When people looked at this hoary and hairy hulk for more than half a second, he would turn to them and say, “죽을래?!” Except it sounded like “축하…ㄹ래!”