Blame America Campaign Picks Up Steam
|UPDATE #2: The anti-US blame game being played in Korea is now making headlines in the US: (HT: Nomad)
South Korea‘s frustration over the plight of Christian volunteers seized by the Taliban is starting to focus on the United States, a frequent target of resentment here. Politicians and citizens of all persuasions are increasingly calling on Washington to help resolve the 15-day-old standoff, believing the United States to be the only country capable of pushing Afghanistan to meet the captors’ demands that Taliban prisoners be freed. […]
An anti-American backlash could boost liberals who have increasingly pushed for Seoul to assert its independence from Washington at the expense of the conservative pro-U.S. opposition that now holds a commanding lead.
What is ironic about this whole thing is that the leftist anti-US politicians are the very reason that Korea has little influence with the US and with what is going on in Afghanistan. If anyone thinks electing another leftist liberal politician is going to change this fact, they will be sadly mistaken and instead will become even more irrelevant.
_______________________________
UPDATE #1: The Taliban has agreed to meet Korean diplomats:
“A South Korean diplomatic delegation is to meet the Taliban for face-to-face talks to look for ways and solutions to free the South Korean nationals,” Ghazni governor Mirajuddin Pattan said.
____________________________
Early today rumors of a hostage rescue mission were swirling around, but were quickly put down by the Afghan government. These rumors caused the Taliban to threaten to kill four more prisoners as the hostage crisis continues on for yet another day.
Also today the blame America campaign being waged by the Korean media and government went into overdrive. I almost don’t even know where to begin. Let’s start with Choe Sang-hun’s article in the New York Times:
On Tuesday, the People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, a civic group based in Seoul, issued a statement accusing Washington of watching the hostage crisis “as if it were a fire across the river.”
“As everyone knows, the Taliban’s demand is something the U.S. government can help resolve, not the Afghan or South Korean government,” the statement said. “The South Korean government, citing its alliance with the United States, dispatched troops for the U.S. war against terrorism. Now why can’t it use the spirit of the alliance to help persuade the U.S. administration and save its own people?”
So who is the People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD) to be waving the “spirit of the alliance” card you may ask? Well they are just another anti-US group that was a member of the Korean Alliance Against the Korea-U.S. FTA that even had one of their own set himself on fire outside one of the FTA meetings in Seoul.
You want some more “spirit of the alliance” from the PSPD? How about this quote from them after the defeat in local elections of the ruling Uri Party:
Mr. Kim of the PSPD said, “The Roh Moo-hyun government should look back to its identity. In the past, the government said it would resolve economic polarization, but it pushed talks for a free trade agreement with the U.S. In addition, the government said it would say what it has to say in diplomacy, but it allowed the U.S. forces to move their base to Daechu-ri.”
The PSPD has been one of the leading groups trying to stop the USFK transformation and relocation to Camp Humphreys and now all of the sudden they are one of the biggest defenders of the “spirit of the alliance”.
The “spirit of the alliance” doesn’t end there. The PSPD has in the past joined forces with North Korean apologists the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) which last year was linked to a North Korean spy ring, to attack the very alliance the PSPD are now advocating:
In the declaration, they demanded that the U.S. government apologize for crimes involving GIs, thoroughly investigate the massacres of Koreans during the Korean War and offer compensation. They also called for an immediate closure of the Koon-ni bombing range in Maehyang-ri, Kyonggi Province and revision of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between the U.S. and south Korea.
The 200 figures who signed the declaration included former Deputy Prime Minister Han Wan Sang; Kang Man Gil, professor emeritus at Korea University; Kim Jong Bae, co-leader of the People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD) and Dang Byong Ho, chief of the south Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU).
There is more, but I think everyone gets the picture of who the People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy group really is. There is plenty more absurdity to come and one of my noted useful idiots Chung Dong-young never fails to deliver. Courtesy of the Marmot’s Hole is this letter to President Bush from the former Korean Unification Minister:
If the 23 (now 21) hostages were American and not Korean, we ask what would the US have done in this situation. Koreans believe that since this crisis is a part of the War on Terror, the US is the main party and not a third party. We appeal to the US to think of the hostages as Americans and take specific measures to solve this crisis.
We respect that there is a “seen principle” among nations that they should not negotiate with terrorists, but there is also an “unseen principle”. We remember the case where an American female journalist was released in exchange for five Iraqi female prisoners, which means there is a recognition that there is an exemption to the non negotiating principle.
Saving a life is more important than one’s obligations and profit. If Pres. Bush was to step forward and save the hostages, then people around the world will continue praising you for your determination, leadership, management, and love.
So who is Chung? Well he is just another one of these “spirit of the alliance” guys that has also just happened to blame the US for the Japanese colonization of the peninsula prior to World War II, blamed the US for the Korean War, and blamed the US for the Gwangju Incident. So it isn’t really surprising he is blaming the US now if the hostages die and of course he is not alone. Via Sonagi comes this quote from Roe Hoe-chan who I just featured in my latest Korea Finder:
Assemblyman Roe Hoe-chan said, “If the US doesn’t show sincerity with regard to the hostage crisis, it’ll practically be a declaration that the US doesn’t care about the safety of Koreans because of its own interests. It’ll be difficult for our citizens to tolerate that. He continued, “If hostages continue to be killed because of America’s rigid stance, anti-American sentiments will be even stronger than in the aftermath of the deaths of Hyo-sun and Mi-seon.”
It was only a matter of time before some demagogue tried to link this current crisis to the 2002 Armored Vehicle Accident for their own political advantage. The fact the Roe is the first to do it is not surprising in the least.
You can always count on Oh My News to keep the absurdity coming:
The South Korean government indirectly asked for the United States, which exercises undue influence over the Afghan government, to be more flexible with its principled policy not to negotiate with terrorists.
“Undue influence”? I think the fact that the US military liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban and has continued to pour blood and treasure into making Afghanistan a sustainable state for the past six years is DUE INFLUENCE, which Korea does not have because they have never been committed to fighting terrorism in the first place. The Roh administration could care less if the government of Afghanistan collapsed tomorrow if it wasn’t for the hostages. There is plenty more laughers in the Oh My News article, but I’ll leave everyone with this quote:
On top of this, the Taliban are also plunging the leadership of South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun into an even worse crisis, trouncing the whole South Korean diplomacy that, before the tragic incident occurred, has smoothly — and successfully to date — handled the North Korean nuclear issues. Namely, inter-Korean affairs have all of sudden dropped to sideshows in terms of foreign policy priorities.
You mean to tell me that North Korea firing missiles all over the Pacific Ocean, testing a nuclear bomb, reneging and then renegotiating a signed agreement that to this day they have failed to fully implement is a sign of Korea’s smooth and successful foreign diplomacy? If this is the case these hostages are most certainly doomed.
There is a whole lot more examples I can provide of the blame game being perpetuated against the United States, but I think it is pretty clear the blame America campaign is currently in overdrive. The fact is that the Korean left and their media allies could care less about these hostages because according to Representative Roe’s own admission, they are trying to turn the hostage crisis into an anti-US issue equivalent to what happened in 2002. Remember it took months for the media and the activist groups to distort what happened during the accident that year in order to set the conditions necessary for the anti-US orgy of hate that took place, that ultimately led to the leftist Roh Moo-hyun being elected president.
The Korean left has no chance of winning the presidential election this year in Korea unless they can find another anti-US issue to rally behind. Chung Dong-young is one of the leftist candidates running for president thus expect him to lead the charge to blame the US for any future deaths of the hostages and use his North Korean linked activist groups to push it on the public. This is the real “spirit of the alliance” in Korea.
Right on the money, as usual!
Great post, albeit Metropolitician-esque long.
Personally, I like being blamed for all the world's ills…it is a source of great strength which gives me the intestinal fortitude to endure being here amongst the Coreans.
[…] Blame America Campaign Picks Up Steam at ROK Drop on August 2, 2007 at 8:02 […]
I plan on pissing in my roommates kimchi later today to show my displeasure for all of this anti-americanism
If the Koreans get what they want, then these half-baked missionaries (a 10-day "mission"?) will possibly have these consequences to account for:
-Taliban prisoners released to go out and kill again and further destabilize Afghanistan
-US and its -real- allies have to launch massive offensives, leading to the inevitable collateral damage and loss of innocent life
-US and allied troops are killed in the process
A good movie for Koreans to watch right about now would be "Babel", but there is something about their character that does not even contemplate unintended consequences, so I don't know if it will help.
Sperwer, thanks
Mark, I stopped where I did just because it was getting so long and there was so much more I could have put into the posting to show the absurdity of the spirit of the alliance claim, but I think what I posted is enough for everyone to get the point I'm making.
Previously, the Taliban were insisting they would agree only to an exchange of captives, not payment or ransom. I wonder if US silence, coupled with media rumors of a possible rescue operation, have prodded the Taliban into changing their minds. From what I understand, the Taliban prisoner wish list contained eight names, mostly low-ranking relatives of the men holding the hostages. If Korea is going to end up paying a million dollars in ransom, it would almost be better to let a few grunts go. A million dollars would buy an awful lot of bomb making material and feed an army.
The original deal was eight Taliban captives for only eight hostages. If they gave up all 21 hostages in return for eight low level prisoners than the US and Karzai may be more willing to cut a deal. However, only exchanging eight for eight means to get the rest of the hostages back the Taliban would probably up the ante.
The Taliban, along with its evil, murderous brethren al Qaeda, aim, as is commonly understood, to creat dissension and greater political devides between America and it's "supposed" allies, and will attempt -and, will likely succeed at- to further inflame Korean passion -Korean passion in general can be over, sometimes way over, the top-and exacerbate anti-American sentiments when in the face-to-face between it and the Korean envoy to Afghanistan to seek its citizens freedom (that was to occur today I believe), there will be just one demand: release of their fellow butchers from American detention. That is not going to happen. The Taliban/al Qaeda know that, and they will cynically play this out with the helpless, desperate Koreans to succeed at just what this blog is entitled. Should the Korean hostages be released for money, the resentment Koreans now have toward the United States will probably become even more widespread and hostile. The Talibastards end up being the only real winners.
Question for Korea observers: Would Seoul pull its troops from both Afghanistan and Irag now, or even just from Afghanistan (within 30 days for example) in exhange for the release of its citizens if the Talibutchers made that demand, and, just to show it means business should Seoul show any hesitation, murders another hostage or two? As numerous Korean news media have reported in past days on the stress that is beginning to acutely grip the Korean psyche, could public pressure become so intense as to force Seoul into making just such a decision? What might the repercussions be for the American-Korean "alliance"? Would this be yet another victory for al Qaeda, et. al?
These guys are the usual suspects. They are parts of the current ruling party, and that party is still a force in Korean politics, even if splintering and currently trying to find what "new party" it will morph into, but this is one of the weaker primary signs I look for in judging the strength in a spike in anti-US activity.
If we start hearing known figures in the GNP coming remotely close to echoing any of these sentiments – even just asking kinda for the US to use more influence – then a warning light will begin to flash in my head……it will be a sign that the GNPers believe average Koreans out in the masses are in tune with what the leftish side of Korean politics is selling in public.
When I was teaching Korean adults, it was easy to get a feel for "the society as a whole" — because I would just listen to what topic each class wanted to discuss. If every class wanted to talk about the same thing – and in the same way — well…..it was obvious.
Being so far away now, it is much harder to get a feel for how notes like these from the usual suspects are playing among the people.
The fact that Korean press is running these quotes in major fashion is somewhat of a sign……Since 2003, they have been less forward in parading out quotes from groups like PSPD.
You can get a little feel for what is going on in Korean society by seeing where as well as when groups like that are quoted. If The Priest is given a voice early in an article, you should batten down the hatches…
Looking at the MacArthur Statue event of, when was it? 2005?, is a good one to see how this works. The media did break with the code of silence to prevent pissing Donald Rumsfeld off and prompting further USFK reformation, but when the quoted from the Goofy Professor and other fringe anti-US leaders, the media painted them in a bad light and gave immediate voice to people in opposition to them.
So, today, look at these articles coming out. If people like these GI Korea quotes from are given a voice – quoted – without the reporter offering a negative reaction or giving someone else a quote in rebuttal —- if the only quotes you are getting are from the typical anti-US types —–
—– then you can feel confident the Korean press is sympathetic to the message they are selling at that time.
Sometimes, that just means the press along likes the message. The press is made up of a good bit of high patriots and leftist sympathisers. But, this isn't the most typical way it works…
I think the more typical situation is —- that the media aligns with the message of the anti-US groups, and quotes from them copiously, because they believe that will sell papers. I think usually, when you see the press quoting from these groups a lot and without rebuttal, it means they believe Korean society is ripe to listen to such a message, and they are usually correct. They usually gauge Korean society's modes fairly well. Sometimes they are able to direct or create the mood. Usually, they play along just like other citizens…
Right now, in this initial stage, I'd say we could be in the first stage of a significant upswing.
If this press coverage continues like this for another week, then I'll think Korean society is accepting this message.
If the GNP starts echoing it in any significant fashion, I will think we are on a tinderbox just waiting for Korean society to feel it has been given the spark to rant and rave.
Some people are mentioning 2002. I'm not in Korea, so I can't listen to Korean people up close and personal, but I would doubt this event is going to come close to that level of active street participation.
I would doubt right now that it will even get as much "water cooler" bitching about the US as we saw with a string of events in 2000, but this kind of spike is more realistic, I think, with this Afghanistan thing in a post-Rumsfeld US-SK alliance.
We'll see…
Waisted the last 2 minutes of my life reading this long drivel from usinkorea (who by the way isn't in Korea anymore). He must have so much time on his hand to write this long garbage. Honestly, he needs to get laid.
Stop wasting your time…
[…] Blame America Campaign Picks Up Steam […]