ROK Refuses to Have F-35s Serviced in Japan

Considering how many more US and Japanese F-35s will be located in Japan it makes sense that the deep maintenance facility would be located there.  Of course the ROKs have to show their displeasure with this:

South Korea said on Thursday it will not send its F-35 fleet to Japan for heavy airframe maintenance, one of the two Asian hubs chosen by the United States to service the Lockheed Martin Corp stealth fighter.

Instead, it is likely to fly the jets to Australia for maintenance, about eight times further away than Japan and well beyond their operating range. The three nations, all key U.S. allies, are the only countries in the region to have ordered the F-35s.

The F-35 program has been lauded as an example of the United States and its allies working together to bolster inter-operability, but in Asia the maintenance plan is bringing traditional rivalry between Seoul and Tokyo to the fore.

The three-star air force general who runs the F-35 program for the United States, Chris Bogdan, told reporters on Wednesday that Japan would handle heavy maintenance for the jets in the northern Pacific from early 2018, with Australia to handle maintenance in the southern Pacific.

“There will never be a case where our fighter jets will be taken to Japan for maintenance,” said an official at South Korea’s arms procurement agency, the Defense Acquisition Program Administration.

“South Korea has the right to decide where to conduct maintenance for its F-35 jets, and it will decide whenever the need arises.”

The plan at the moment is for the 40 F-35s to be acquired by South Korea to be serviced in Australia, an Australian defense ministry source told Reuters on condition he wasn’t identified.

South Korea will receive the first of the stealth planes in 2018.

A source familiar with the F-35 program said South Korea could, at a later stage, negotiate with Washington on the possibility of handling the heavy maintenance of its own F-35 jets.

Such a deal would require a significant investment by Seoul, including specialized equipment used to test the jets’ stealth. [Reuters]

You can read more at the link, but when the ROKs decided to pursue the F-35 you would think that this was something that was discussed as part of the contract talks; so this should not be too surprising. I would not be surprised that this is just a big media show for domestic consumption now.  2023 is the earliest that the ROK’s F-35 need servicing so a lot can change by then.   So it makes sense that Korean politicians now do not want the headache of being accused of compromising defense of the nation to Japan needlessly and let politicians down the road work something out where these planes are quietly serviced in Japan.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JoeC
JoeC
9 years ago

“You can read more at the link … “

What link?

Leon Laporte
9 years ago

I’d be more than happy to be serviced in Japan.

Liz
Liz
9 years ago

Lol Leon!
I’m not surprised they didn’t discuss this during the contract negotiation. More fundamental and urgent issues than that are ignored. Things like, “Oh, we didn’t know that the engines are too hot on takeoff for every concrete known to man”, “Oh, yeah…but don’t worry, we’re trying to invent new concrete…”

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
9 years ago

“I’d be more than happy to be serviced in Japan.”

I was going to write that painfully obvious comment… but I decided it was more elegant to let some other clever sucker do it…

…so I could ask…

…what they like so much about having a fat American contractor sticking his tool up their tailpipe.

Well?

Leon Laporte
9 years ago

I don’t suppose the Japanese would want to send their jets to Korea either. The US screwed up. Why didn’t they set up the facility someplace like Guam? It would have been neutral for all and has the added benefit of giving Americans jobs.

Liz
Liz
9 years ago

“The US screwed up. Why didn’t they set up the facility someplace like Guam? It would have been neutral for all and has the added benefit of giving Americans jobs.”

I’m sure every variable has been taken into account by someone. Keep in mind, Lockheed is a big player here…not the US government. Lockheed pays for a portion of maintenance costs, too, up to many years down the line. Palms were greased in exchange for ordering planes, I’m sure.

Leon Laporte
9 years ago

I’m sure every variable has been taken into account by someone.

Yeah, I’d imagine one of those variables is avoiding paying taxes…

setnaffa
setnaffa
9 years ago

@8, that line never gets old!!! 😆 😆 😆

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x