Army Unit’s Knight Logo Causes Controversy In Hawaii

Here is the latest controversy on the religious freedom front:

A sign outside an Army training center at Fort Shafter, Hawaii, that featured a knight with crosses on his breastplate and shield was taken down Monday afternoon, hours after the head of a religious-freedom advocacy group called for the image’s removal.

The image represented the “Fighting Knights” of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 8th Special Troops Battalion. Members of the unit recently transformed an unused motor pool area into a warrior training center, 8th Theater Sustainment Command spokeswoman Sgt. 1st Class Mary Ferguson told Army Times. A news release detailing the offerings of the center went out Friday at Army.mil and other locations and included an image of the sign.

The knight with red crosses is “not an approved logo,” Ferguson said. She said she wasn’t sure how long the sign had been up or who approved the design, noting that the center had opened recently. A photo of the sign hosted by the U.S. Pacific Command website is dated Oct. 23.  [Army Times]

You can read the rest at the link, but if the cross was whited out is having a knight as a logo still approved or are knights now officially politically incorrect?

By the way Army Times if you wondered where the image came from just do a Google image search for the word knight and the knight on the board is one of the top search results from this webpage.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jazz
Jazz
9 years ago

But the company’s flash has a red cross in it. Will they have to change that also?

JoeC
JoeC
9 years ago

I don’t know about the Army but the Air Force has had a policy and procedures for approving unit insignia since its Army Air Forces days. This guide gives its history.

World War II expanded the use of Air Corps insignia, with hundreds of new emblems appearing
both officially and unofficially. The War Department dictated the policy by which Army Air
Forces’ organizations submitted emblems for approval and rejected only a few. Many
organizations failed to submit their designs for approval, however, and consequently in later
years members of these organizations found no approved emblem on file. 5 When the Air Force
became an autonomous military service in 1947, its leaders authorized an heraldic program that
sought to avoid the widespread use of unauthorized emblems.

Army Air Forces Letter 35-46 issued on 10 September 1945 established procedures for designing
and submitting emblems for approval. This letter contained policy on the design, approval, and
use of organizational emblems. …

You can’t just adopt anything you feel like.

setnaffa
setnaffa
9 years ago

And picking what appears to be a Templar Knight (http://ageoftruth.dk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Knights-Templar-4.jpg) might actually be a connection between Crusaders fighting Muslims that the President’s buddies at CAIR wouldn’t like.

Aside from the knee-jerk reaction to an image of warriors who had a code of honor, respected women, defended the weak, and all that chivalry stuff. Far too Euro-centric. Doesn’t show Muslim pirate, Ninjas, Orcs, or back-stabbing traitors in a good light…

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x