North Korea Claims US Responsible for 1976 DMZ Axe Murder Incident
Here is just another example of the fantasy land narrative in North Korea:
On Thursday, the anniversary of the incident, the Korean People’s Army Panmunjom Mission spokesman said that North Korea will “never forget the Panmunjom incident, which took place intentionally under U.S. imperialists looking for an excuse to start a war of invasion while permanently occupying the South.”
North Korea stated the U.S. version of the incident was a “cunning stratagem” to find a way out of its responsibility for the event, adding that the incident is a “serious lesson in history.”
“Only death lies for aggressors and provokers,” North Korea said in the statement issued on KCNA.
According to Pyongyang, the incident involved U.S. forces “pushing forward” South Korean “puppet guards” who “screamed in the direction of [North Korean] soldiers” then assumed “combat-ready positions.”
The South Korea and U.S. forces then brought in “heavy weaponry” and installed a “large surveillance tower.” Their “perilous military provocations tell all,” North Korea stated. [UPI]
You can read more at the link as well as more about the DMZ Axe Murder Incident at the below link:
- DMZ Flashpoints: The 1976 DMZ Axe Murder Incident
[i]Their “perilous military provocations tell all,” North Korea stated.[/i]
The fact those blowhards still have Pyongyang instead of a still-smoking radioactive hole 1500 meters deep tells a lot, too…
(SAC went on alert for a lot longer than the papers indicated.)
North Korea is like a biitch that won’t shut the fukk up about shyt that happened years ago but now she has it all twisted up in her head that it was all your fault and now you have to pay… mostly by enduring her constant yapping.
Sometimes a sharp open-handed smack settles them down for a bit.
But a few years later they are biitching about how you hit them for no reason.
You can’t win with a biitch like North Korea.
…unless you kick her azz to the curb.
There is a lesson somewhere in there in both personal relationships and geopolitics.