Where the Majority of US Military Servicemembers Come From
|For those who have served in the military these statistics are probably not surprising:
With an active-duty force comprising merely 0.4% of the U.S. population, this divide between the military and the rest of society is unsurprising. However, and despite the services’ continued efforts, two trends are making it harder to bridge the divide: increased regional and familial concentration within the armed forces.
Why should this disturb us? Because of its subtle impact on the most important decision our nation’s leadership ever makes — when to put young men and women into harm’s way. It also undermines the military’s need for public support.
First, the facts: Having a relative who served in the military has become a critical indicator as to whether an individual will even consider military service. Among veterans under age 40, 60% have an immediate family tie to the military, compared to only 39% of civilians. Of the new recruits joining today, approximately 25% have a parent who has served. As time goes on, this pattern isolates military service; it is becoming a burden borne by an increasingly small number of families.
Similar trends emerge when examining the regional makeup of the force. Places where the military has historical roots, including locations close to military bases, draw more young men and women into the service. So 60% of new military recruits come from the South and the West, with the South alone contributing 36.9% of all recruits, while the Northeast and Midwest remain underrepresented relative to their population of people aged 18 to 24. In fact, half of the states in the U.S. contribute more than their fair share, and half contribute less. Though the service academies receive nominations from all 50 states, they are only one source of military commissions, focused solely on officers. Geographically, the military today is simply not representative of the U.S. population, depriving the armed forces of the organizational strength that comes from diversity. [USA Today]
You can read more at the link.
“depriving the armed forces of the organizational strength that comes from diversity”
“Diversity” is not a solves-all-problems magic word.
The right tools for the right job is better than a toolbox full of micromanipulators when you need to rebuild an engine.
Northern snowflakes who aspire to be comparitive European lesbian poetry majors are underrepresented? Great. Some Southern good old boys and Western guys with the blood of cowboys flowing through their veins who grew up cussing and shooting is who I want defending the country.
+50 more thumbs up.
It was me. I gave you the thumbs down.
Don’t encourage CH, it only makes him worse. 😎
LOL Smokes
(cyber raspberry)
I wondered if anyone was going to jump on the “diversity” red meat in the article. Chickenhead never disappoints.
He’s probably got diversity colon cancer by now……
Smokes, can I be worse? Good to know. I will try harder.
Johnnyboy, what is “diversity colon cancer”? Why would I have it? How do I leverage it to hurt snowflakes?
Maybe the Military should emulate Tom Sawyer’s fence-painting gag… Or we tie voting to gummint service like Heinlein’s Starship Troopers… The folks unwilling to serve in the military vote to be slaves anyway…
Yes, of course you can. From my POV you’re at your worst when you write a sixteen paragraph post demanding that someone debate you on every point. It’s RokDrop not RokTheasus. 😈
I wear that -1 like a badge of honor. 😛
“Yes, of course you can.”
I will strive harder to be worser.
“From my POV…”
Why would it be from your personally owned vehicle. Please don’t text and drive. It is a safty issue.
“you’re at your worst when you write a sixteen”
Hey, look… I’m not Anthony Weiner. She was eighteen. Probably.
“paragraph post demanding that someone debate you on every point.”
Well, they shouldn’t bring point up if they can’t back them up.
“It’s RokDrop not RokTheasus”
I hope there is no theasus involved… considering that word does not exist. It also isn’t RokJsjsushehsgafstdueiaokwndbhd.
What was your point again?
I was trying to make a play on words with GI’s “diversity” red meat comment. Not a great one, I guess.
Personally, I agree with you 100% on attempts at diversity versus what accomplishes the job most effectively.
I may have mentioned this here before but while I was majoring in computer science, Sharpton or Jackson made a push for more diverse hiring practices in the tech industry.
I’m almost certain they looked only at the numbers at the end of the chain: how many “people of color” are employed by tech companies. If they had looked at the beginning of the chain — how many minorities are choosing to major in computer science — they would have seen what was obvious to anyone. Those students just aren’t there.
If they truly cared or understood the problem, they wouldn’t be harping on the tech industry to hire people who don’t exist. They would be initiating programs in minority communities to interest the youth in technology careers.
yeah, was a good article, up to that sentence.