General Petraeus Believes that President Trump’s Rhetoric Is Intended to Get China’s Attention

Here is what retired General and former CIA Director David Petraeus had to say about President Trump’s rhetoric towards North Korea:

David Petraeus

The United States is unlikely to go to nuclear war with North Korea despite the recent escalation in tensions, a former director of the Central Intelligence Agency said Sunday.

David Petraeus, who served in the Barack Obama administration from 2011-2012, said he thinks U.S. President Donald Trump has been using tough rhetoric with North Korea to get the attention of the leadership in China, not in Pyongyang.

“This is about getting President Xi’s attention … so that China will really clamp down on the umbilical cord through which 90 percent of the trade that goes to and from North Korea transits,” Petraeus said in an interview on ABC News.

China is able to “bring North Korea to its senses,” he added, alluding to Beijing’s leverage as Pyongyang’s main ally and economic benefactor.

North Korea carried out two long-range missile tests in July and a sixth nuclear test in September. Trump declared shortly thereafter that he would “totally destroy” the North if it posed a direct threat to the U.S.

Petraeus said a nuclear war is still unlikely.

“I don’t think likely. No,” he said. “I think, in fact, that again all of this is a communications strategy that is trying to make sure that China understands that this administration is in a very different situation from any of its predecessors, that North Korea on this president’s watch could have the capability to hit a city in the United States with a nuclear weapon.”  [Yonhap]

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Smokes at Work
Smokes at Work
7 years ago

Once you’ve seen Petraeus in his underwear you can’t un-see it. True story. 😯

Liz
Liz
7 years ago

I believe you, Smokes.
I wouldn’t want to see him in his underwear. LOL

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 years ago

Smokes, how did you see Petraeus in his underwear if you were bent over and facing the other way?

Tbonety1r
Tbonety1r
7 years ago

“Smokes, how did you see Petraeus in his underwear if you were bent over and facing the other way?”

The mirror?

Smokes at Work
Smokes at Work
7 years ago

“The mirror?”

Were you the guy hiding in the closet with the camera?

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
7 years ago

“Were you the guy hiding in the closet with the camera?”

Sure… if, by camera, you meant jar of Vaseline and wide-eyed leer.

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x