Is Kim Jong-un Playing South Korea and the United States as Fools?
|There is a good read posted over at Foreign Policy by Michael Green from the Center of Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) that explains very well the concerns I have been sharing about this supposed peace initiative being executed by North Korea:
South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s televised summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Friday was spectacularly effective as pageantry aimed at South Koreans fearful of a U.S. attack on North Korea — and spectacularly empty in terms of meaningful commitment by the North to denuclearization. In fact, everything Kim put on the table was designed to reaffirm North Korea’s status as a nuclear weapons state and dilute Chinese and South Korean support for sanctions. Many veterans of negotiations with North Korea worry that Kim is now getting ready to play the United States. While the Trump administration’s tough sanctions no doubt had some role in pushing the North toward this summitry, one can also imagine exactly how this was a scenario the North itself sought from the beginning. [Foreign Policy]
Green then goes on to write a satire email from Vice Marshall Kim Jong Gak, director of the Political Bureau, Korean People’s Army to Kim Jong-un on their peace strategy. Here is an excerpt from the email:
You will pledge seemingly historic commitments that are all unverifiable and easily reversed, many of which we have deployed successfully in past negotiations. These include your commitment (like your father’s and grandfather’s) to the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, your pledge to join the global quest for denuclearization as the other nuclear weapons states have pledged to do under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, a promise not to transfer nuclear weapons to third parties, a no-first use pledge, and a promise to halt testing and to shut down our nuclear test site at Punggye-ri (for added drama, you might invite inspectors to the facility).
These commitments all parrot the aspirations of the current members of the nuclear weapons club and will thus confirm our membership in that club as we negotiate arms control with the Americans as a fellow nuclear weapons state. We, of course, made no commitment to cease production and deployment of our deterrent. We can easily reverse all these steps later, at the time of our choosing, yet already many in the imperialist and puppet media are proclaiming these meaningless declarations on your part to be a historic breakthrough.
I recommend reading the whole thing at the link, but as I have been saying since this whole peace initiative began, the Kim regime was conducting a facade. The North Koreans are very good at executing facades and Kim Jong-un has shown a particularly great talent for it, so much so that he has most in the international media believing every word he is saying.
The short term goal of this facade is to create a perception of progress towards peace and denuclearization on the peninsula to justify South Korea reopening the Kaesong Industrial Park, restarting joint tourism projects, and other inter-Korean cooperation initiatives that will be huge cash cows for the Kim regime. In return the Kim regime will pretend to denuclearize and make other commitments that can easily be reversed at a time of their choosing.
The Kim regime’s long term goal backed by China is to get the United States out of South Korea. That is why there has been such a strategic messaging emphasis on a peace treaty to end the Korean War. If there is a peace treaty South Korean leftists could argue why US forces are still needed in South Korea? The Kim regime’s even longer term goal is to separate the US from Japan as well with their surrogates in the media already pushing ideas of removing the US nuclear umbrella for Japan as part of any denuclearization agreement.
The wild card in all of this is President Donald Trump. South Korea, China, Russia, and most in the international community are willing to pretend denuclearization and a lasting peace is happening. Will the United States? For all we know President Trump could be conducting his own facade. For the US to get international consensus to conduct any strike against North Korea all options will have to be exhausted. Since this supposed peace process has began President Trump has been saying all the right things and being very reasonable even agreeing to meet with Kim Jong-un.
Going into the negotiations President Trump could be very solid about stringent inspections to ensure denuclearization compliance. If the Kim regime does not agree to stringent inspections or agrees and then plays their old tricks against inspectors than President Trump could have his rationale to strike North Korea. Or maybe President Trump is willing to go along with the facade to get a Nobel Peace Prize like his rival Barack Obama did and then let some other future US president deal with the consequences when Pyongyang ultimately reneges on the deal. Time will tell but the next 1-2 years should continue to be interesting times on the peninsula as everyone involved continues to play their role in this great facade.
I’d put money on this guy being right. It sounds like a typical Commie ploy. Divide and conquer. Whisper sweet nothings and smile. Whole country is swept up in Pyongyang fever. A far cry from the ramen hoarding and air drills from last year.
The only fly in the Nork soup is Trump. And his buddies Pompeo and Mattis.
One hopes they are wise enough to see this obvious ploy. Whethrr they want to save South Korea depends entirely on Moon. I believe they will act to save US interests, including Japan.
South Koreans should hope Moon is wise enough to know that.
For US diplomacy to work, there needs to be a credible threat of military action. Kim Jong Un and his henchmen know that Trump is a wuss and will not order a pre-emptive strike on the DPRK.
Yep, kim convinces everyone peace is breaking out, commie moon will ask US troops to leave and then WHAMMY! Of course makes it easier when commie moon is playing for the red team.
As I explained to my wife. If there is a peace treaty and the Korean War Officially ends. If South Korea asks the US to leave, we have no choice but to leave. You may ask, “Why are we still in Japan and Germany?” Because we had a war with them and won. We are not an Occupying Force in South Korea, we are here by agreement and invitation only/
Old Tanker, if there are no more US troops in the ROK, will US investors get cold feet and pull out, too? GM, CitiCorp, and quite a few others are there.
Are there outher sources of foreign investment in South Korea that might likewise leave? I imagine the Russians and Chinese will stay.
I worry a little about my family over there snd I will miss visiting them and buying kitchy stuff in the shops outside K-55 if the US pulls out; but South Korea needs to put on their big-boy trousers and decide whether we’re helping them or not.
I “reckon” we’ll respect their wishes.
I wouldn’t put any money into the Confederation of the People’s Republic of Korea. It would be Saigon all over again once the last GI leaves Korean soil.
Why would investors flee once tensions subside? I would think the opposite, and doubt USFK being there or not will have any significance. If they 2 sides do eventually sign a formal peace treaty, I don’t think USFK will be told to leave. Maybe reduce the overall footprint, but not leave entirely.
“Tbonetylr_lives”, just take a look at foreign investment in other “Workers’ Paradise” locations like Zimbabwe (Mugabe was trained in Pyongyang) and Venezuela (largest oil reserves in the world and can’t even supply its citizens with food, water, or toilet paper).
Of course, Korea will be COMPLETELY different… 🙄
GM and Citi heavily invest in China, they’ll invest in a China-influenced Korea, too.
GM will probably end up leaving here considering the Commie auto unions and the cars they made don’t sell.