B.R. Myers Thoughts on the Aftermath of the Trump-Kim Summit
|ROK Drop favorite Professor B.R. Myers has posted some thoughts about the Singapore Summit:
Considering how much of the agreement was obviously worked out before the summit — and with how many portents of American weakening — it’s wrong to blame Trump for what happened on the day itself. His buffoonery was mortifying, yes, but edifying too. All he did was act out the hoary conventional wisdom as if on a pantomime stage. The spectacle was a devastating caricature of all our wishful dealings with the North.
As the day unfolded it became clear that, once again, our side had devoted far more attention to event-planning than to ideological reconnaissance. We saw the usual indifference to the question of how the North could justify its existence after disarming. We saw the lie given to our tough-guy rhetoric. We saw a familiar and quintessentially American combination of credulity and condescension.
All this was as old as the nuclear crisis itself. But for once we got it without any dignifying sheen of sophistication. I suspect many observers who professed to be appalled by Trump’s performance were really only lamenting the lack of that sheen. Their criticism of him for not getting more from Kim in writing makes little sense. Either the regime has changed fundamentally or it hasn’t. If it has, it would indeed be counter-productive to impose a series of hurdles that must be jumped over within a certain time. If it hasn’t, no concessions it might commit to paper are going to have any more value than the last ones. [B.R. Myers]
As always I recommend reading the whole posting at the link, but Professor Myers’ big issue with the Trump administration is that they are viewing North Korea as a failed communist state eager to open up and develop like China. Myers believe this is wishful thinking if one studies and understands the ideology of the Kim regime. The very legitimacy of the ruling Kim regime is threatened if it disarms and no longer seeks reunification under North Korean terms.
Professor Myers has been one of the strong advocates of the viewpoint that the overall goal of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program is to force the withdrawal of US troops and create a confederation of the Korean peninsula under North Korean terms. This viewpoint has led to criticism by people who think the nuclear weapons are just to keep the US from trying to militarily remove the Kim Regime and that the North Koreans are not stupid enough to think they can actually unify the peninsula on their terms.
What this viewpoint does not understand is that the Kim regime is not going to seek reunification in a 1950’s like invasion, but rather through a war of skirmishes ending in a confederation on North Korean terms. One Free Korea sums up the Kim regime’s strategy the best in the below analysis:
The fall of Seoul will not end with the crash of tank treads through the Blue House gates, or by renaming Seoul Kim Il-Sung City, but with signatures, handshakes, smiles, clicking shutters, and the praise of editorialists that two warring states “de-escalated tensions pragmatically” by embarking on a “peace process.” The surrender will be too gradual, and the terms too vague, to be recognizable as such. It will have something like the consent of the governed — that is to say, the soon-to-be-ruled — through the assent of elected leaders who will approve a series of easy, lazy decisions to yield to Pyongyang’s calculated confrontations, embarking irreversibly toward the gradual strangulation of free debate, and then, a slow digestion into one-country-two-systems hegemony on Pyongyang’s terms. [One Free Korea]
Read the whole thing at the link.
Meanwhile, Myers, as usual, attacks Trump for trying to solve the conflict without killing Norks. And he is apparently not nearly so critical of the Nork government that threatens to nuke LA–I don’t recall him saying anything stronger than “that’s who they are.”
He’s devoid of actual merit on those two points.
And his piece reads like he got it while sitting in Chomsky’s lap.
He has a right to publish what he wants. And we have a right to use it to wrap fish guts or line birdcages.
It’s not that I dislike the man, it’s just that his politics make my skin crawl.
Joshua at freekorea.us is also a bit of a NeverTrumper; but his reasoning is more balanced and mature.
I am not certain either has sat through the kind of business deals Trump has, given their immature assertion that results must be immediate. Large corporations negotiate over IT outsourcing with deals regularly taking 18-24 months to conclude. Stanton and Myers seem to prefer things that take less than an hour.
@setnaffa, can you be more specific on what you don’t like about this politics?
Myers to me is just frustrated by the Trump administration actually thinking they can get the Kim regime to denuclearize and make Chinese style reforms just like prior administrations thought they can do. What we don’t know is that the Trump administration may be giving the Kim regime one last chance to denuclearize over a specified timeframe before other measures are taken. Thus Bolton’s recent comments about 1-year to denuclearize.
Myers holds low regard for everyone who has been working on NK. He has been held in low regard by almost all of the experts who have brought us to this point.
He mentions in the posting that his book The Cleanest Race was a hot item in the Trump WH last year, and he is disappointed the current policy is ignoring it.
It seems to me DJT is doing everything to get Kim to save himself.
If Kim fails to find a way to denuke – an action Myers believes is impossible – it will get very hot very quickly. Trump is not ClintonBushObama.
Trump is a wuss and KJU is well aware that he will not order a pre-emptive strike ot the DPRK.
What exactly is a rock “marne”?
Maybe it is an acronym?
Raped
Orally
‘Cause
Kicking
My
Ass
Really
Never
Ends
GI, Myers never attacks the brutal dictatorship of the north in these articles, just Republicans, I’m not a Republican, was a Democrat, and voted Trump because I detest the Clinton Family for many reasons (not least of which is Billy Jeff’s accepting a Rhodes Scholarship and then promoting himself as the “First Black President).
I realize Myers knows more about Korea than I; but he and the other impatient folks are either partisan hacks hoping to destroy the peace process or ignorant jackasses braying their lack of experience as a form of virtue-signalling.
I apologize for not being more kind to strangers that I’ve never met; but my family still lives within artillery range of nork batteries. And their insistence on telling me a guy who got the teamsters to deliver in NY and NJ doesn’t know how to negotiate wears a little thin after awhile.
Example 1: “His buffoonery was mortifying”
Myers couldn’t be elected chairman of his own fanclub; but he feels free to call Trump a buffoon and libel over 60 Million American voters.
Example 2: “If we don’t see what we want by the winter of 2020-21, our options will be far more limited than they are now.”
Myers apparently believes Trump’s team was not explicit in the consequences of maintaining the nuclear and missile programs. The rest of the world knows North Korea was given a chance to emerge as a winner without any additional craters. But there are always consequences to bad decisions.
Rockmarne is Egg McMuffin in drag.
https://www.redbubble.com/people/attractivedecoy/works/22873935-egg-mcmuffin-for-president?p=sticker
For the Google-impaired, Cecil Rhodes, founder of the Rhodes Scholarship, was an Englishman who went to South Africa, skillfully maneuvered himself into control of the diamond mines and DeBeers, bought the Prime Minister job, invaded what is now Zimbabwe (calling it Rhodesia), invented Apartheid, and created an Oxford scholarship in his name. As elaborated on in his will, Cecil Rhodes’ goals in creating the Rhodes Scholarships were to promote civic-minded leadership among “young colonists” with “moral force of character and instincts to lead”, for “the furtherance of the British Empire, for the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire…”
@setnaffa, Myers doesn’t need to attack North Korea in every article he writes. He makes it very clear in his book that he believes that North Korea is a military dominated society led by a racist and maternal regime. He also believes the Kim regime does not fear an external attack more than an internal legitimacy crisis. Denuclearization and other demands made by the US would threaten the regimes legitimacy. These are all themes Myers writes about consistently in his articles.
As far as his comments about Trump it almost felt like in his posting that he had to say something negative about Trump so his opinions won’t be dismissed by other in his field as him being a Trump supporter.
I think Myers really thinks that the Trump administration has bought into this Chinese style reform narrative for North Korea and why he is advocating so strongly against this line of thought. Like I have always said if the Trump administration drops sanctions before any real denuclearization happens then we should all start to panic. I haven’t seen any indication of that yet.
” Like I have always said if the Trump administration drops sanctions before any real denuclearization happens then we should all start to panic. I haven’t seen any indication of that yet.”
Next week’s trip to Pyongyang by Secretary Pompeo should give us a good indication on how the Trump administration plans to proceed with sanctions.
Having said that … it’s almost a losing battle in some respects because it appears the Chinese (and Russians) are backing off.