So you don’t think that 70+ days lockdown had anything to do with it? I do agree with you, though, that officialdom in China would have no problem in sacrificing any number of people, from one to millions.
setnaffa
4 years ago
johnhenry, you obviously do not understand human nature, economics, or virology. The lockdown was allegedly to give medical folks a chance to brace for the expected onrush. It has morphed several time into a transparently political form of intimidation. And many countries (hint: Sweden) have instituted masks and distancing without lockdowns and without the fear pr0n death stats.
In fact, why haven’t the homeless been entirely killed off?
The Sino Sinus Syphillus is so serious that only 99.98% of those exposed will survive…
J6Junkie
4 years ago
The ROK slipping even closer to dictatorship.
Political critic Chin Jung-kwon said such an attempt to limit a judge’s right to make legal judgments could pose a threat to democracy by giving way to dictatorship.
“When the judge was making the decision, there had been no cases of outbreaks from a massive rally yet. The judge was also unable to predict if other protesters would join the rally. Even if he could predict, this cannot provide legal foundations to ban the freedom of assembly guaranteed in the Constitution,” Chin wrote on Facebook, Sunday. “If those with power could restrict basic rights of the people citing an emergency situation, this could lead to dictatorship.”
Bring back the Recent Comments!
Or maybe it’s my phone. When I scroll down, I don’t see anything except the place holder.
It is almost like communist china had a treatment ready before the virus was released, otherwise how do you explain this? Commies always willing to sacrifice a few 10s of thousand of their own to achieve party goals.
https://www.euronews.com/2020/08/18/wuhan-goes-wild-thousands-attend-pool-party-in-former-covid-19-epicentre
http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=294991
Moon’s C Team doing some great work.
So you don’t think that 70+ days lockdown had anything to do with it? I do agree with you, though, that officialdom in China would have no problem in sacrificing any number of people, from one to millions.
johnhenry, you obviously do not understand human nature, economics, or virology. The lockdown was allegedly to give medical folks a chance to brace for the expected onrush. It has morphed several time into a transparently political form of intimidation. And many countries (hint: Sweden) have instituted masks and distancing without lockdowns and without the fear pr0n death stats.
In fact, why haven’t the homeless been entirely killed off?
The Sino Sinus Syphillus is so serious that only 99.98% of those exposed will survive…
The ROK slipping even closer to dictatorship.
Political critic Chin Jung-kwon said such an attempt to limit a judge’s right to make legal judgments could pose a threat to democracy by giving way to dictatorship.
“When the judge was making the decision, there had been no cases of outbreaks from a massive rally yet. The judge was also unable to predict if other protesters would join the rally. Even if he could predict, this cannot provide legal foundations to ban the freedom of assembly guaranteed in the Constitution,” Chin wrote on Facebook, Sunday. “If those with power could restrict basic rights of the people citing an emergency situation, this could lead to dictatorship.”
http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=295002