Should U.S. Navy Build Naval Vessels in Japanese and Korean Shipyards?

This is a good idea, but I do not see this getting through Congress for approval when they will be looking to protect jobs in their district related to ship building:

But experts who spoke to CNN before the summit say a potential solution to one of them – the Chinese fleet’s numerical advantage – is within reach, if the US is prepared to think outside the box.

Washington, they say, has something Beijing doesn’t: Allies in South Korea and Japan who are building some of the highest spec – and affordable – naval hardware on the oceans. 

Buying ships from these countries, or even building US-designed vessels in their shipyards, could be a cost-effective way of closing the gap with China, they say. 

Their warships are “certainly a match for their (Chinese) counterparts,” says Blake Herzinger, a research fellow at the United States Studies Center in Australia, while Japan’s warship designers “are among the world’s best,” says Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center in Hawaii.

Both countries have mutual defense treaties with the US, so why doesn’t the US team up with them to outbuild China?

The problem is, US law currently prevents its Navy from buying foreign-built ships – even from allies – or from building its own ships in foreign countries due to both security concerns and a desire to protect America’s shipbuilding industry.

CNN

You can read more at the link.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
setnaffa
setnaffa
1 year ago

The law is there for a reason.

We could, and should encourage our allies to build many “escort” ships to assist in combatting piracy, anti-aircraft=anti-submarine duties, and generally to look less like fat, lazy, juicy targets to countries that might want to swallow them whole.

You know, “Si vis pa em, pra bellum” really works.

We need to shake a leg on our own ship-building capabilities, too. When the USSR was around, we needed a “600 shop Navy”. In its absence, we have many additional threats, so we still ne a Navy 3x larger than we have.

All free people need to “prepare to repel boarders”.

setnaffa
setnaffa
1 year ago

Oh, and “Experts” assured CNN of a lot of things that just aren’t so.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
1 year ago

Set, you left out the “c” in peace.

Fact o’ the Day: Para bellum mean prepare for war. And now you know where 9×19 Parabellum got its name.

9mm Luger got its name from the German word for luggie, as the size, shape, and color very much resemble a lung oyster.

.38 Special was just called that by its mother and it stuck.

.44 magnum got its name because we both use the same condòms.

…the more you know.

setnaffa
setnaffa
1 year ago

Yes, I was typing on my cell phone in a hurry and did not do a great job of spell-checking myself…

And my firearm of choice was that quad-.50 turret on the back of the bombers I rode in…

But now I have something better. 🙂

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x