Opposition Party Wants to Ban People with Pro-Japanese Views from Holding Office in South Korea

Here we go again with the Korean leftists trying to raise anti-Japanese sentiment for political purposes:

Seoul’s presidential office is facing mounting pressure as controversial remarks regarding Japan by President Yoon Suk Yeol’s foreign policy aide have prompted criticism from the opposition for bringing humiliation to South Korea.

Labeling the aide’s remarks as carrying the intention of a “pro-Japanese traitor” — or “chinil” in Korean, describing those overly favorable to Japan to the extent of betraying national interests — the liberal main opposition Democratic Party of Korea pledged Tuesday to propose a bill to prohibit people who had previously praised or justified Japan’s 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula from becoming public officials. The main opposition party also pledged to introduce the bill as closely aligned with its core party policy, meaning that party members would all vote for it to counter Yoon’s conciliatory approach to Japan.

The latest controversy hails from a media interview with Kim Tae-hyo, the first deputy director of the presidential National Security Office. Kim said in an interview with public broadcaster KBS on Friday evening that Yoon’s omission of Japan’s wartime wrongdoing from his Liberation Day speech comes from Seoul’s forward-looking approach to its bilateral ties with Tokyo.

“If Japan turns a blind eye to its history and fails to say what it should say, we should harshly complain about it and try to change that,” Kim said.

“But what matters is Japan’s feelings (about apologizing),” Kim added. “When we pressure someone who does not feel inclined to do so to apologize, does that truly help Korea-Japan relations and cooperation? The level of trust between Kishida and Yoon seems very high.”

This answer was in response to the interviewer’s question about criticism over Seoul’s failure to speak up boldly about bilateral issues with Tokyo.

Korea Herald

You can read more at the link, but why doesn’t the Korean Democractic Party instead of passing a bill to ban people who make pro-Japanese statements from holding office pass a bill saying that if you make pro-North Korean statement you cannot hold public office? Japan for many decades has not been a threat to South Korea and has strong economic and cultural ties. North Korea on the otherhand continues to be a threat on all fronts to South Korea.

The reason the Democractic Party doesn’t want to pass a bill banning people with pro-North Korea views from holding office is because many of them would have to leave government then. The Korean left is filled with those sympathetic to North Korea and even spies.

If the government wants to pass a bill, pass one against those holding pro-China views. China is the nation that most recently attacked and devestated South Korea during the Korean War five years after the Imperial Japanese were defeated. China continues to be the nation that enables North Korea to be the threat to South Korea that it is today not Japan.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Flyingsword
Flyingsword
2 months ago

communists being communists.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
2 months ago

Sounds as though the Yoon administration is being anti-revolutionary.

The best solution for that is to abolish private property.

Maybe monkeypox will do what covid couldn’t quite.

Stephen
2 months ago

Korea was “annexed” by Japan in 1910 during an on-going struggle on the Korean and Liaodong Peninsulas between Russia, China and Japan.

Of these four nations; Japan was the first to westernize and industrialize following the Meiji Restoration.

Japan saw that it had no choice but to militarize with modern technology, or it would go the way of Indochina, the Malayan and Indonesian archipelagoes and the Indian subcontintent and be a subject nation of Britain or France.

If Japan hadn’t “annexed” Korea; would South Korea still be a “tributary state” to China as North Korea is now?

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
2 months ago

If Koreans had been well-armed, Japan (and later, North Korea) would have kept out.

But, a toothless tiger is just a large oddly-colored rabbit.

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x