You’ll never have a denuclearized North, so the South should be able to do whatever it pleases.
Korean Person
7 days ago
You’ll never have a denuclearized North, so the South should be able to do whatever it pleases.
At least Kevin Kim says something that makes sense.
The Setnaffarians have been calling for South Korea not to pursue a nuclear weapons program fearing that it will lead to the withdrawal of USFK from Korea or maybe angst from their Russian allies.
setnaffa
6 days ago
I agree with you, Kevin, South Korea should be able to do whatever it pleases. And they should consider the ROI of having such weapons and how safe they would be vs. just being the gun store for conventional weapons…
Where and how would they use special weapons? Japan? North Korea? China? Philippines? What would such a war look like before/during/after?
Has possession of nukes make India or Pakistan more safe from their neighbors? What about Israel? What about the USA and Russia?
Having a short dick doesn’t get better just because you have more weapons that cost a lot to create, test, store, protect, and dispose of. Where will South Korea store the radioactive waste? How will the government manage the massive increase in eco-protestors?
Here’s a useful video for people with two or more brain cells:
You know nothing. Just shut up. Nobody needs to answer your stupid questions.
Korean Person
6 days ago
@setnaffa doesn’t want Korea to have nuclear weapons.
He pretends to agree with Kevin Kim but that’s a futile attempt to throw off his detractors.
At the end, he expresses his opposition by throwing a lot of “stupid questions.”
Anyone with a brain knows that nuclear weapons are a deterrent.
Should South Korea have nuclear weapons, then it is a deterrent against North Korea and China, a guarantee of its security, and lessen its dependence on the USA and the USFK in particular.
However setnaffa wants South Korea to depend on the USFK for its security.
He has constantly opposed South Korean domestic weapons programs .
No doubt he wants South Korea to be weak which will make things easy for his Russian masters and their Chinese allies.
ChickenHead
6 days ago
“Anyone with a brain knows that nuclear weapons are a deterrent.
Should South Korea have nuclear weapons, then it is a deterrent against North Korea and China, a guarantee of its security, and lessen its dependence on the USA and the USFK in particular.
However setnaffa wants South Korea to depend on the USFK for its security.”
I gave this a thumbs up.
– Nuclear weapons are a deterrent and everyone in the elite Club wants everyone else to stay out of their elite club. You will see this pattern repeat in life.
– Nukes would be a pretty big security guarantee for South Korea. America has been a very reliable partner and the relationship has been very beneficial to Korea for an amazingly long time… from the days a black market Spam to currently allowing close observation on 5th generation fighters and how to use them. But, as Kissinger pointed out, it is frequently fatal to rely too much on America.
– Yes, America want Korea to be dependent. This goes for the entire world and I didn’t know it was a secret.
Whatever the case, these are resonable observations so they get a +1.
setnaffa
6 days ago
How many countries have refused to attack Israel even though they have nukes?
Is that a stupid question?
Or is the real question more like who will be the next power to use them and bring the condemnation of the whole “civilized” world?
Hypocrites are everywhere, even in the sweatshops full of chinabots.
You’ll never have a denuclearized North, so the South should be able to do whatever it pleases.
You’ll never have a denuclearized North, so the South should be able to do whatever it pleases.
At least Kevin Kim says something that makes sense.
The Setnaffarians have been calling for South Korea not to pursue a nuclear weapons program fearing that it will lead to the withdrawal of USFK from Korea or maybe angst from their Russian allies.
I agree with you, Kevin, South Korea should be able to do whatever it pleases. And they should consider the ROI of having such weapons and how safe they would be vs. just being the gun store for conventional weapons…
Where and how would they use special weapons? Japan? North Korea? China? Philippines? What would such a war look like before/during/after?
Has possession of nukes make India or Pakistan more safe from their neighbors? What about Israel? What about the USA and Russia?
Having a short dick doesn’t get better just because you have more weapons that cost a lot to create, test, store, protect, and dispose of. Where will South Korea store the radioactive waste? How will the government manage the massive increase in eco-protestors?
Here’s a useful video for people with two or more brain cells:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPGbl2gxGqI
You know nothing. Just shut up. Nobody needs to answer your stupid questions.
@setnaffa doesn’t want Korea to have nuclear weapons.
He pretends to agree with Kevin Kim but that’s a futile attempt to throw off his detractors.
At the end, he expresses his opposition by throwing a lot of “stupid questions.”
Anyone with a brain knows that nuclear weapons are a deterrent.
Should South Korea have nuclear weapons, then it is a deterrent against North Korea and China, a guarantee of its security, and lessen its dependence on the USA and the USFK in particular.
However setnaffa wants South Korea to depend on the USFK for its security.
He has constantly opposed South Korean domestic weapons programs .
No doubt he wants South Korea to be weak which will make things easy for his Russian masters and their Chinese allies.
“Anyone with a brain knows that nuclear weapons are a deterrent.
Should South Korea have nuclear weapons, then it is a deterrent against North Korea and China, a guarantee of its security, and lessen its dependence on the USA and the USFK in particular.
However setnaffa wants South Korea to depend on the USFK for its security.”
I gave this a thumbs up.
– Nuclear weapons are a deterrent and everyone in the elite Club wants everyone else to stay out of their elite club. You will see this pattern repeat in life.
– Nukes would be a pretty big security guarantee for South Korea. America has been a very reliable partner and the relationship has been very beneficial to Korea for an amazingly long time… from the days a black market Spam to currently allowing close observation on 5th generation fighters and how to use them. But, as Kissinger pointed out, it is frequently fatal to rely too much on America.
– Yes, America want Korea to be dependent. This goes for the entire world and I didn’t know it was a secret.
Whatever the case, these are resonable observations so they get a +1.
How many countries have refused to attack Israel even though they have nukes?
Is that a stupid question?
Or is the real question more like who will be the next power to use them and bring the condemnation of the whole “civilized” world?
Hypocrites are everywhere, even in the sweatshops full of chinabots.