US Ambassador to South Korea Criticizes Trump’s Defense Claims

I have always said that Trump’s claims that South Korea is getting a free ride is inaccurate and Ambassador Lippert is calling him out on it as well.  Trump should specify what he thinks South Korea should pay if he wants to criticize like this because South Korea pays a lot more than many other nations getting a free ride off of the US defense umbrella.  With that said Trump probably fully knows that South Korea pays a lot already and is just repeating the claim that resonates with low information voters:

Amb. Mark Lippert speaks to members of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea at a Seoul hotel on March 28, 2016. (Yonhap)

U.S. Ambassador to Seoul Mark Lippert on Monday dismissed accusations by Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump that South Korea is paying little to keep American troops on its soil.

Without naming Trump, Lippert cited various reasons why the allegations aren’t true, including the fact that South Korea shoulders 55 percent of all non-personnel costs and increases its defense spending by 3 to 5 percent annually.

“We feel very good about the resource sharing that we and the Republic of Korea do together as an alliance,” the ambassador said during a meeting with members of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea. “It is remarkable.”

Lippert was responding to a request for comments on a “U.S. political candidate’s” contentions that the country receives little from South Korea in exchange for its support.

Trump has made repeated claims that South Korea is getting a free ride on defense, saying recently that the U.S. is “constantly sending our ships, sending our planes, doing our war games” but being “reimbursed a fraction of what this is all costing.” He also told The New York Times he would withdraw American troops from South Korea and Japan unless they boost their financial contributions to the upkeep of the U.S. military presence.  [Yonhap]

You can read more at the link.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruce K. Nivens
Bruce K. Nivens
8 years ago

Mr. Trump probably thinks that it’s cheaper just to buy North Korea outright, like a big real estate deal.

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
8 years ago

Depending on how you represent the numbers and how big of picture you want to consider, Trump may he more correct than what he is being credited for.

South Korea pays 55 percent of America’s expenses in keeping them secure… seems legit… though that security could arguably be more than 55 percent important to Korea than America.

…but in a larger picture, this does not include payroll for 28,500 people. It does not include expenses under stateside budgets such as AAFES, parts of joint excercises, etc. And it does not include a portion of development and depreciation costs for all that fancy hardware. There are likely many more second and third order expenses that are involved with keeping security in Korea.

Trump likely sees a bigger picture in any situation that looks like a business deal and is intuitively aware that 55 percent is a bullshyt politically-inspired number that doesn’t truly reflect Amerca’s expenses in Korea.

There is nothing wrong with spreading a larger percentage of development costs, manufacturing costs, training costs, etc., to allies who take full advantage of a larger system than just a bit of hardware parked in their yard.

Everybody wants to cut the deficit. Everybody wants to reduce defense spending. Everybody bitches when a businessman looks at ways to do it from a business perspective…

…likely because most people are encouraged to think small and are incapable of seeing anything beyond that. It makes their opinion easy to manipulate.

Trump became a politician 9 months ago… and he does not have all the answers… but he is very smart, a very quick study, surrounds himself with sharp people rather than political hacks…

…and has a clever record of saying thing that draw media attention with outrage and denial that later turn out to he true. This is likely very calculated.

If this ever becomes a real issue, it is likely very easy to show that of all the money that America spends to protect Korea on a global scale, Korea spends a far smaller percentage than the political class would like the American taxpayer to believe.

Denny
Denny
8 years ago

Trump ans Sanders are embracing the liberal position, to decrease US troop presence overseas. The traditional conservative position is to increase US troops overseas.

setnaffa
setnaffa
8 years ago

Of course the current Ambassador opposes Trump. He saw what happened to another Ambassador when Hillary was in charge…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
8 years ago

Ah… good old Lippert. No matter how you slice it, he is taking a stab at Trump. He should cut that out and come up with some new rhetorical chops or he will be labled a political hack. It would be great if he could do it in the nick of time; otherwise, no dice.

@GI… your points are valid… but however you wish to do the math, a good part of the world takes advantage of a large back-end of American military research, manufacture, training, and experience… but only wants to pay a PORTION of the front-end that directly benefits them… while still getting all the benefits of the back-end.

Meanwhile, the American taxpayer is 17 trillion dollars in debt with a crumbling infrastructure, cuts in a lot of (non-security state-related) services, crappy trade deals with most of these countries, etc.

The American military is a valuable product that provides a service which costs money to develop and maintain. It really appears America is not getting compensation worthy of the value for this service…

…which can be calculated by figuring out what it would take for an ally to develop their own 5th generation fighter, float a network of satellites, set up a carrier group, etc., Etc., ETC.. all which would benefit them in a time of need… but which they would rather have American taxpayers foot the bill for… which is fine with heavily-lobbied politicians looking for short-term regional gain rather than a larger American picture.

Trump appears to know both the price and the value of things… and he is pointing this all out.

America CAN get a better deal. There is nothing wrong with wanting that.

Ole Tanker
Ole Tanker
8 years ago

Trump is doing the standard Demagoguery, looking for the knee jerk reaction from the typical self righteous American, that we do everything for all the other countries. Those of us with personal interaction,hate the obvious situations we have personally seen of the abuse of American tax $$$. Black Market, Kickbacks, LQA Fraud etc..ad nauseam. DUH!! Let’s break it down Fred and Barney style!
The truth lies somewhere in between.

johnnyboy
johnnyboy
8 years ago

Knee jerk reactions aren’t always incorrect.

It might not be true in the way the average American thinks it is, but it is probably still true.

Obviously we shouldn’t pull out of our alliances with ROK, NATO, and others, but we should still angle for better deals when possible.

setnaffa
setnaffa
8 years ago

Whatever happened to that “…teach a man to fish…” stuff we were supposed to believe?

ChickenHead
ChickenHead
8 years ago

Setnaffa, “teach a man to fish” is not really good policy when it comes to making war.

You might find yourself becoming a fish.

…but selling fish at market price is a good business decision.

Selling fish at half price while your family goes hungry is foolishness.

But a lot of people are foolish… either because their hate for Trump blinds them, they get a fish for free on the side, or they are just foolish.

setnaffa
setnaffa
8 years ago

I’m a big fan of helping folks become self-sufficient and while I need to forgive those who harm me, I expect my government to take decisive action against folks who want to kill or enslave us.

And by that I do not mean strongly-worded #hashtags, I mean put ’em in a hole and put dirt on ’em.

From a distance by ICBMs is okay. Up close with A-10s is okay as long as we have the folks willing to do that.

And as a non-GOP voter, I want to see who’s running before I settle for Cruz… 😉

johnnyboy
johnnyboy
8 years ago

Speaking of strongly worded hashtags, check out #TheChalkening.

It’s a shame that college kids are running out of safe spaces.

13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x