Former Financial Times journalist John Burton thinks the Trump administration is to paternalistic with South Korea and should let them settle their own differences with North Korea:
John Burton
The U.S. has been doing itself no favors in its rather paternalistic response to the thawing relations between the two Koreas at the Winter Olympics.
The bottom line message emerging from Washington is that South Koreans cannot be trusted in handling Pyongyang. The U.S. is worried that North Korea is trying to drive a wedge in relations between Seoul and Washington. But the Trump administration’s own behavior is contributing to the possibility of any split.
And if the South Koreans can’t be trusted with their own security, then why should the U.S. be so concerned about defending them unless it is for some ulterior motive such as maintaining a military presence on the Asian mainland to counter China?
The fact is that the Koreans have reached out to each other because of fears that Trump might launch a “bloody nose” preventive attack that could result in appalling destruction across the Korean Peninsula. No wonder why Koreans want to give peace a chance.
But the U.S. has not reacted well to what is happening in PyeongChang. The American media has reported about South Koreans having been seduced by the wily charms of Kim Yo-jong, described as North Korea’s Ivanka Trump, and her accompanying “army of beauties.”
Many predict that her siren song is likely to result in President Moon Jae-in accepting her invitation to travel to Pyongyang and meet her brother, Kim Jong-un, who will trick the South Koreans into undermining the international sanctions regime against North Korea over its nuclear program. [Korea Times]
You can read more at the link, but Mr. Burton is also upset with Vice President Pence not standing and showing respect to the North Korean delegation at the Winter Olympics. I have to wonder if Mr. Burton thinks the then Apartheid South Africa should have been allowed in the Olympics and shown proper respect as well?
Mr. Burton then goes on to say the South and North should be allowed to resolve their issues themselves without US interference. That boat has long ago sailed when North Korea decided to begin launching ICBMs and testing nuclear weapons capable of mass destruction in the United States. If North Korea was not conducting such activities threats of “bloody nose” strikes and “maximum pressure” campaigns by the Trump administration would not be happening.
Until North Korea gives up on these programs the United States will continue to have a vested interest in any negotiations between North and South Korea. Especially after the original Sunshine Policy that sent billions of dollars to North Korea is arguably the reason why the Kim regime now has nuclear and ICBM weapons to threaten the US with. Because of this the Trump administration rightfully should be advocating against any give aways by the Moon administration to the Kim regime for little or nothing in return.
So he used to be a political writer at a left-leaning rag and now he’s smarter than the foreign policy folks advising the President. And while talking of “respect”, he shows none for the USA. I wouldn’t have given this jackanapes the time of day; but it’s obvious the Korea Times likes his Moon-like politics.
Koreans should understand that removing the US from the mix will make a preemptive strike much more likely, as we won’t need to worry about their opinions at that point.
Great, let them settle their differences. First the South Koreans have to ask for an end to the UN mandate and withdraw from the ROK US alliance. Then the US can send everyone home and the South Koreans can be on their own to settle the differences with their brothers in the north. I certainly don’t want to be here when that happens though.
True. Although I expect it’ll be more like the current Turk invasion of Germany than the German invasion of Belgium. In 1940
C̍͜h̝̚i̙̔c̱̊k̤͋e̐͜n̺̊Ḧ̗́e̳͆a̗͌d̨̓
6 years ago
The nightmare is South Korea being flooded with North Koreans.
It will then be time to buy a gun.
…though on a plus side, it is really going to lower the street price for a happy ending for about a decade.
Jon Paul
6 years ago
Burton’s ideas really only make sense IF you start from the position that anything the US does is bound to be incorrect because, because, well, because it’s the US. Okay, got it. I’m always amazed at the reflexive (read: unthinking) anti-Americanism of these Euro-Experts-On-World-Affairs. In Burton’s case, as other posters have said, he completely ignores the status of the North Korean regime in terms of human rights, and assumes that we don’t need to discuss that part of the problem in any detail. You can bet, however, that he will be first in line to denounce the US’s human rights record whenever and wherever he can.
So he used to be a political writer at a left-leaning rag and now he’s smarter than the foreign policy folks advising the President. And while talking of “respect”, he shows none for the USA. I wouldn’t have given this jackanapes the time of day; but it’s obvious the Korea Times likes his Moon-like politics.
Koreans should understand that removing the US from the mix will make a preemptive strike much more likely, as we won’t need to worry about their opinions at that point.
Yes, it means “tame monkey”.
Great, let them settle their differences. First the South Koreans have to ask for an end to the UN mandate and withdraw from the ROK US alliance. Then the US can send everyone home and the South Koreans can be on their own to settle the differences with their brothers in the north. I certainly don’t want to be here when that happens though.
True. Although I expect it’ll be more like the current Turk invasion of Germany than the German invasion of Belgium. In 1940
The nightmare is South Korea being flooded with North Koreans.
It will then be time to buy a gun.
…though on a plus side, it is really going to lower the street price for a happy ending for about a decade.
Burton’s ideas really only make sense IF you start from the position that anything the US does is bound to be incorrect because, because, well, because it’s the US. Okay, got it. I’m always amazed at the reflexive (read: unthinking) anti-Americanism of these Euro-Experts-On-World-Affairs. In Burton’s case, as other posters have said, he completely ignores the status of the North Korean regime in terms of human rights, and assumes that we don’t need to discuss that part of the problem in any detail. You can bet, however, that he will be first in line to denounce the US’s human rights record whenever and wherever he can.