A reduction in USFK would not influence Kim. He wants all troops removed & an end to the alliance & extended deterrence. That is his definition of the removal of the US "hostile policy" and a the "security guarantee" that he desires. And removal of troops will lead to conflict. https://t.co/G1THtuBaOW
The question to ask Eunjung Cho is “How many North Korean nukes facing Seoul, Tokyo, Guam, and/or Manila are okay?”
That’s how many we should let them keep. None. And it’s black and white.
Without a commitment to get rid of them all, plus trustworthy 3rd party inspections, we have to assume the number of DPRK bombs and warheads — and danger of an “nuclear accident” — grows constantly.
The question to ask Eunjung Cho is “How many North Korean nukes facing Seoul, Tokyo, Guam, and/or Manila are okay?”
That’s how many we should let them keep. None. And it’s black and white.
Without a commitment to get rid of them all, plus trustworthy 3rd party inspections, we have to assume the number of DPRK bombs and warheads — and danger of an “nuclear accident” — grows constantly.