U.S. Negotiators Walk Out of Cost Sharing Talks with South Korea
|I wonder if the U.S. negotiators have learned a few techniques from the North Koreans to pressure the ROK on the cost sharing issue. Storming out of negotiations as the media is describing it comes off as very North Korean like and not a good look for U.S. negotiators in my opinion:
Defense cost-sharing talks between South Korea and the United States were abruptly cut short Tuesday as the U.S. negotiators walked out of the meeting and accused Seoul of making proposals falling short of “fair and equitable burden sharing.”
The unexpected ending underlined wide differences between the two sides after Washington’s reported demand for a fivefold increase in Seoul’s sharing of the cost of the upkeep of about 28,500 American troops stationed in South Korea.
The latest round of negotiations, which began Monday, was supposed to last through Tuesday. But Tuesday’s second day of talks ended in about an hour as the U.S. negotiators left the meeting, South Korean officials said.
“Unfortunately, the proposals that were put forward by the Korean team were not responsive to our request for fair and equitable burden sharing,” James DeHart of the U.S. State Department told local media shortly after the talks ended.
“As a result, we cut short our participation in the talks today in order to give the Korean side some time to reconsider and, I hope, to put forward new proposals that would enable both sides to work towards a mutually acceptable agreement,” he said. “We look forward to resuming our negotiations when the Korean side is ready to work on the basis of partnership on the basis of mutual trust.”
Yonhap
You can read more at the link, but it appears what is going on is that the ROK is refusing to include payment for the deployment of strategic assets to the ROK like aircraft carriers, submarines, etc. that support exercises as well as show of forces against North Korea.
The Moon administration is probably liking this because politically it will help them in upcoming parliamentary elections early next year if they are perceived to be standing up to the Trump administration who is trying to fleece the hard working Korean taxpayer. This is good politics for them and likely why there will be no movement on this issue unless the U.S. side gives up the big increase in ROK contributions.
I can’t really say what went on behind closed doors, but perhaps it was a good move. Only the people in the meeting can say.
GI, can you remind me why Americans should pay for South Koreans to be free when South Koreans aren’t willing to pay?
And I still have family I love in the ROK, so it’s not hatred but frustration.
If South Korea wants to be independent, that’s cool; but moochers and looters we don’t need.
And America really would not suffer if Moon is successful in surrendering to Kim Fatty III…
If Korea wants to be free of the US, per the agreement, all they have to do is say so and the US will pack up and leave.
Trumpeans unite!
❗
We really are attracting a lesser form of troll lately. I wonder if they’re really just not trying, or if it’s a nutritional issue? Maybe they need more kimchi to release their intestinal blockages?
Haggling 101.
And yeah, the trolls lately haven’t been very good. I’m thinking China hasn’t assigned ROK Drop any quality trolls due to the lack of Korea Finder lately. 😉
@setnaffa, the ROK does pay about a billion a year for US forces on top of the even larger amounts of money they pay purchasing U.S. weapon systems. The argument is if they should pay more and the Trump administration thinks they should. The negotiators are the ones trying to make this happen, but I don’t see how being depicted as “storming out” by the Korean media helps their cause.
Thanks GI! As a taxpayer, I wonder how much it really costs. As a relative, I just want the Koreans to wise up.
South Korea can always ask Fat Leader to defend them. Just sayin’…
Rocket Man!!
But they probably have to ask real polite. And bring Choco-Pies…
@MTB Rider it’s called Korea Finder? I thought it was the Comfortable Chairs Invitational Tournament….lol
Fact Check: True. CC knows Korea and is quite agile.
However, I believe he should be required to present future trophies to an non-CC winner next year and moving forward. Champion Emeritus, as it were. The new winner will then provide both GI and CC with sufficient seasonally-appropriate beverages of their choice to cover the necessary speeches and etc.
I see that as a win-win scenario. Especially as I don’t recall ever having more than one or two points and am not in danger of winning.