South Korean Ruling Party Suggests Charging USFK to Use Korean Ports & Railways

This appears to be a way that the Korean government may try and hit back at U.S. negotiators trying to work out a new USFK cost sharing agreement:

Rep. Cho Jeong-sik, chief policymaker of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea, center, speaks during a party meeting at the National Assembly, Thursday. Yonhap

Members of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) Thursday floated the idea of including South Korea’s indirect financial contributions for the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) as “leverage” if Washington keeps asking Seoul to pay “excessive” costs. 

“If Washington keeps making absurd demands, South Korea will seriously reconsider the adjustment of indirect costs created by the USFK apart from defense cost-sharing,” Rep. Cho Jeong-sik, chief policymaker of the DPK, said during a party meeting, Thursday.

Underlining that U.S. President Donald Trump’s current rumored demand for Seoul to pay $5 billion for U.S. forces here is “excessive” and not written in the U.S.―South Korea Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) or the Special Measures Agreement (SMA), he added the U.S.’ demands for Korea to pay more in additional categories such as rotation of U.S. forces and off-peninsula drills are irrelevant to the defense of the Korean Peninsula.

“Korea is making large contributions in many categories directly and indirectly. For example, Korea is letting the USFK use harbors, railways and land for free. It costs 3.5 trillion won as of 2015. Seoul can [recalculate the indirect contributions] and use them as leverage,” another DPK lawmaker who is familiar with the SMA negotiations said during a phone interview with The Korea Times.

Korea Times

You can read more at the link.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
setnaffa
setnaffa
5 years ago

How dare those USFK troops defend Korea and require Korea to pay! They sure have a lot of nerve…

https://www.archives.gov/research/military/korean-war/casualty-lists/state-level-alpha.html

setnaffa
setnaffa
5 years ago

On February 25, 1953, while on a night intruder mission near Sunan (Pyongyang), B-26B Interceptor Bomber s/n 44-34413 with the 8th Bombardment Squadron, 3rd Bombardment Group, Light was hit by anti-aircraft fire. The crew (CPT Wilbur Jensen, USAF, CPT De Forrest Von Laufer, Jr, and TSGT Leonard Bendinsky) were listed as Missing in Action and was presumed dead on December 31, 1953. No remains have yet been recovered.

There are over 50,000 US troops who died so South Korea could sing F*CK USA K-Pop songs and get fat on KFC instead of developing intestinal parasites while serving Kim Il Sung’s fratricidal spawn.

BTW, I’m thankful we saved these ungrateful arses because my wife’s family, pre-6/25 refugees from somewhere north of the 38th Parallel, were able to survive and thrive. Their family members who chose to stay behind were all killed. And I realize not all Koreans are craven, narcissistic, or in the pay of Kim Fatty.

Abcdefg
Abcdefg
4 years ago

How dare your ungrateful Korean wife survive?

setnaffa
setnaffa
4 years ago

Yeah. Way to show your class there sparky. I’d welcome the opportunity to discuss it in person; but frankly, I normally just use bug spray to kill cockroaches.

liz
liz
4 years ago

How dare your ungrateful Korean wife survive?

So…you’re sayin’ the ROK is our bitch.

setnaffa
setnaffa
4 years ago

Liz, a lot of Chinese people believe that…

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x