Right. As long as they’re considered an enemy nation, they’re not going to be entering into any kind of trade treaty with the United States.
setnaffa
2 years ago
Their choice, johnhenry… Their choice…
Korean Man
2 years ago
And the question would be reversed back to this reporter, so then why would North Korea give up their nuclear weapons when we’re still at war? Why would North Korea take a chance that they will become a Ukraine or Lybia after they unilaterally gave up their nukes? American/Western promises mean absolutely zero, considering what has happened in recent history.
Last edited 2 years ago by Korean Man
ChickenHead
2 years ago
I am with Korea Man on this.
If I was NK, I would never give up the house atomics.
Iraq and Libya were clear lessons to the world what happens if you think you can put down your stick and pet the rabid dog of American diplomacy… or, more accurately, global corporatism’s technically and tactically capable but strategically incompetent military wing.
Reread “The Mouse That Roared”.
They want $$$.
Right. As long as they’re considered an enemy nation, they’re not going to be entering into any kind of trade treaty with the United States.
Their choice, johnhenry… Their choice…
And the question would be reversed back to this reporter, so then why would North Korea give up their nuclear weapons when we’re still at war? Why would North Korea take a chance that they will become a Ukraine or Lybia after they unilaterally gave up their nukes? American/Western promises mean absolutely zero, considering what has happened in recent history.
I am with Korea Man on this.
If I was NK, I would never give up the house atomics.
Iraq and Libya were clear lessons to the world what happens if you think you can put down your stick and pet the rabid dog of American diplomacy… or, more accurately, global corporatism’s technically and tactically capable but strategically incompetent military wing.