Not Many Options Available for South Korea In Response to North Korea’s Trash Balloon Provocations
The Korea Times has an article published that discusses what little options South Korea has to deter North Korea’s trash balloons:
Complicating matters for them is the apparent shift in North Korea’s intentions behind the balloon launches. Initially, Pyongyang claimed the balloons were in retaliation against anti-North Korean leaflets sent by South Korean civic groups, many of which consist of defectors from the North.
“The regime has continued the balloon campaign even after the leaflet launches stopped. This suggests that the balloons are now a tit-for-tat response to South Korea’s use of loudspeakers along the border,” Yang said.
In late July, South Korea resumed propaganda broadcasts across the border in response to the balloon launches. These broadcasts operate simultaneously from fixed loudspeakers in the border regions at full volume.
A military official said that the broadcasts are still operating from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. but declined to provide further details, citing operational secrecy.
“Instead of blasting the broadcasts day and night, our military should use the broadcasts more flexibly depending on the North’s behavior, such as switching them on only when it launches the balloons and turning them off when it remains silent for days,” Cho said.
Yang suggested that an ideal scenario would be for both Koreas to agree to a moratorium on psychological warfare, although this seems unlikely given their hawkish stances and the absence of a communication channel.
The professor also mentioned the possibility of international organizations such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) — where both South and North Korea are member states — mediating to ease tensions caused by the balloons.
He added, “Unless the government takes swift action, we are going to see thousands of more balloons since conditions are becoming more favorable for North Korea’s balloon launches, with winds blowing southward in the fall.”
You can read more at the link, but I don’t think North Korea has any intentions of stopping the trash balloons. It is a low cost gray area provocation for them that is providing them valuable military intelligence on where these balloons are landing while disrupting South Korean society. This disruption is putting pressure from the public on the Yoon administration to do something when there is really not much they can do.
I have no idea what to do, so here’s a stupid thought: with light drones being as cheap as they are, have hundreds of drones patrol the south side of the DMZ and shoot or kamikaze any balloons as soon as they cross into ROK airspace. What would the North do then, shoot across the DMZ and into South Korea to down ROK drones? With their old, inaccurate weapons? Would they risk revealing any newfangled weapons? Intelligence-gathering works both ways.
Drones by the hundreds do precision maneuvers for light shows all across South Korea. The ROK obviously has a huge supply of them. How hard can this be? What, aside from severe weather, are the impediments? And any Chinese spyware chips in the ROK drones can be taken out and replaced with good Korean ones if anyone is worried about sneaky Chinese tech helping North Korea.
Send your own balloons. Send so many it blots out the sun. Let the great balloon wars commence!
So balloons delivering poop by wind is OK.
What if their payloads were compressed and fired back over the border.
Is that an artillery attack or just returning what was lost, also not under its own power.
Before we think of clever dances, we gotta know what kind of music the fiddler is playing.
For fun, I designed a simple machine that uses a roll of plastic tube and a tank of hydrogen. It seals the end, rolls out a length, fills with hydrogen, seals the end, releases, repeat.
It would be trivial to attach a poop and trash hopper.
It can do 2 a minute.