Will the UN Save Darfur?

Recently the UN announced that a 26,000 member peacekeeping force had been agreed upon to be deployed to Darfur.  Sounds like good news right?  Well, not if you start reading the fine print.  First of all the force won’t even be on the ground until next year and the ability fill a 26,000 member force is dependent on UN countries volunteering forces to participate in the UN operation.  For those not familiar with UN peacekeeping, many of the soldiers involved in UN peacekeeping are not there to actually help the country they are deployed too.  They are actually there to collect a paycheck because UN peacekeeping pays better than what they would make in their home country’s military.  Thus soldiers from third world nation’s make up the vast majority of UN peacekeepers:

Top Countries Who Provide UN Peacekeepers
Pakistan – 10,173
Bangladesh – 9,675
India – 9,471
Nepal – 3,626
Jordan – 3,564
Uruguay – 2,583

Additionally, countries that are host to UN peacekeepers prefer having soldiers from third world nations because they are ineffective.  So it is a win-win for everyone involved because the peacekeepers are making a bunch of money while the country they are supposedly providing peacekeeping for is not impacted by their presence, and the UN gets to claim they are doing something and request more funding.  UN peacekeeping is often nothing more than a self licking ice cream cone.  A self licking ice cream cone is not something that will do anything to help the people in Darfur. 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
17 years ago

[…] in August with much fanfare it was announced that the UN would send up to 26,000 peacekeepers to Darfur.  Everyone patted themselves on the back and called this a great thing.  However, if […]

trackback
17 years ago

[…] I predicted before the increased UN peacekeeping force in Darfur would do nothing to change the situation there, but by looking at the Lebanon model things may actually become worse there as well. Share This Popularity: unranked Watch the latest videos on YouTube.com […]

trackback
16 years ago

[…] I like this idea because the ROK military is large, well equipped, and adequately trained to conduct peacekeeping missions. For people who have interacted with UN peacekeepers they can tell you that UN peacekeepers are largely a joke and in it for the money thus the reason why third world nations comprise the majority of UN peacekeepers. […]

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x