6. Military personnel subject to this order shall not provide money or anything of value to an employee or establishment for the primary purpose of obtaining an employee’s company or companionship, inside or outside a bar or establishment. This includes paying a fee to play darts, pool, or to engage in other entertainment with an employee, or buying a drink or souvenir in exchange for an employee’s company. Service members who fail to comply with the provisions of this paragraph may be subject to punishment under the UCMJ, adverse administrative personnel action, and/or other adverse actions authorized by applicable laws and regulations.
This paragraph supersedes USFK Regulation 27-5, paragraph 8-6, dated 7 July 2011, until amended to conform to this policy letter.
7. If any member of USFK observes this conduct or sees indicators of prostitution or human trafficking, they should immediately contact their local law enforcement desk or the USFK Prostitution and Human Trafficking Hotline at DSN 736-9333 or Comm 0505-336-9333.
8. Questions concerning this policy should be directed to your servicing legal office or USFK/JA at DSN 723-7349 or Commercial 050-5333-7349.
//ORIGINAL SIGNED//
CURTIS M. SCAPARROTTI
General, U.S. Army
Commander
DISTRIBUTION:
A References.
a. DoD Instruction 2200.01, Combating Trafficking in Persons (CTIP), 15 September 2010
b. USFK Command Policy Letter #1, Zero Tolerence Policy, 2 January 2014
Fortunately General Scaparrotti did try and pull a LaPorte and make this policy applicable to DoD civilians, contractors, and dependents. It only applies to soldiers. This does beg the question of how this will be enforced. A juicy bar is still going to have a bunch of non-servicemembers buying drinks for juicy girls and some of them may look military. So will the CPs demand ID of everyone they see that may look military? That is asking for trouble to happen. Fortunately the vast majority of soldiers being professionals will comply with the policy letter, but there will assuredly be those who will try and get around it.
The policy letter also tries to capture all the work-arounds the juicy bars might use to get around this policy. For example the policy letter bans paying for darts and pool in exchange for time with juicy girls. A couple of work-arounds I do not see it covering would be a cover fee to enter the bar. What if a bar owner charges servicemembers $50 to enter the bar that has juicy girls in it? The job of the juicy girl would then be to wait outside the bar and try to get servicemembers to come inside. Or how about the bar owner charging inflated drink fees for servicemembers? So instead of the juicy girl trying to get the servicemember to buy her drinks, her job becomes to get the servicemember to buy drinks for himself. If the servicemember does not buy a drink for himself then she moves on to the next customer.
This is just a couple of ways I could see the bar owners subverting the policy which they will assuredly try and do. It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I think USFK has effectively gotten out ahead of the special interest groups back in the US
that were looking to use the juicy girl issue to bash the US military with. This new policy letter pretty much prevents whatever sensationalism on this issue they had planned even if the bar owners try to implement work-arounds.