Here is yet another example of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces having to release someone falsely convicted of rape:
In a landmark decision Wednesday, the military’s highest court ruled that the Navy’s top lawyer, Vice Adm. James W. Crawford III, illegally meddled in the case of a SEAL accused of rape.
In a split 3-2 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces tossed out the highly decorated commando’s 2014 court-martial conviction and barred the armed forces from ever trying him again.
The legal victory of Senior Chief Special Warfare Operator Keith E. Barry — who never quit proclaiming his innocence — will ripple across the entire military.
Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Scott W. Stucky, a retired Air Force colonel, determined that not only can the military’s most senior attorneys be held responsible for bogus advice that helps to unlawfully coerce a prosecution but that Crawford “actually did so in this case.”
Called the “mortal enemy of military justice,” unlawful command influence, or UCI, occurs when superiors utter words or take actions that wrongfully influence the outcome of court-martial cases, jeopardize the appellate process or undermine the public’s confidence in the armed forces by appearing to tip the scales of justice. [Navy Times]
Here is the key part of this decision that the Court of Appeals is trying to create awareness of:
Designed to buttress the public’s perception of the military criminal justice system, the majority’s decision also raises hard questions about “the political climate surrounding sexual assault” caused by the “increased scrutiny by Congress as well as other political and military leaders” on commanders who convene court-martial cases but also go through Capitol Hill, the Pentagon and the White House to get promoted.
The concern is that commanders fearing for their careers will just send people accused of sexual assault to trial on flimsy evidence to avoid any repercussions to their career advancement. If you read the whole story at the link you can see that the Seal was accused with flimsy evidence by an ex-girlfriend, but the leadership was under significant political pressure to convict him. To make matters worse top Naval lawyers who knew better were encouraging conviction as well.
I don’t know if this will change the culture of guilty until proven innocent for people accused of sexual assault, but it is a start.